Literature DB >> 18181887

Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned chemotherapy for solid tumours.

S Khan1, A Dhadda, D Fyfe, S Sundar.   

Abstract

The ability to deliver the planned dose and intensity of chemotherapy (the amount of drug administered/unit of time) is important for tumour control and survival. In clinical practice, neutropenic events are the main limiting factors towards achieving this aim. We assessed the impact of neutropenic events [defined as either hospital admission due to febrile neutropenia (FN), dose delay > or =7 days due to neutropenia or dose reduction of > or =15% due to neutropenia] on dose intensity (DI) in a random sample of 50 patients with various solid tumours. Fifty patients who received systemic chemotherapy for solid tumours were assessed as part of this study. Using a pre-programmed data collection tool via computer, retrospective data were collected. The neutropenic events were defined before data collection. The patient characteristics are as follows: breast 26 patients (stage I-6; II-3; III-17), colorectal 16 patients (stage I-6; II-3; III-7) and others 8 patients [small cell lung cancer (SCLC), ovarian, peritoneal and oesophageal cancers]. The chemotherapy regimens used are Flourouracil, Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) 14 patients (28%); 5 Flourouracil/folinic acid (5FU/FA) 12 patients (24%); Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC) 11 patients (22%); other 13 patients (26%). Neutropenic events occurred in a significant proportion of patients (overall 40%; breast 26%; colorectal 56%; others 25% of patients) and in a significant number (21%) of chemotherapy cycles. Overall, dose delay was the most common neutropenic event, occurring in 30% of patients (breast 32%; colorectal 31%; others 25%% of patients). Dose reduction due to neutropenia was noted in 20% of patients (breast 12% colorectal 38% others 13%% of patients). Hospitalizations due to FN affected 8% of patients. Only two patients had granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) as treatment for two cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) in patients with neutropenic events was 81% compared with 92% in patients without an event and the results were consistent for different cancers. In total, 65% of patients who experienced one neutropenic event were likely to experience subsequent events. In conclusion neutropenic events have a significant impact on the ability to deliver planned DI. Hence, proactive use of GCSF has the potential to improve adherence to the planned schedule of chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  17 in total

1.  Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Gilles Freyer; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Konstantinos Syrigos; Mihai Marinca; Giuseppe Tonini; Say Liang Ng; Zee Wan Wong; Antonio Salar; Guenther Steger; Mahmoud Abdelsalam; Lucy DeCosta; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Severity and predictive factors of adverse events in pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Miyahara; Naoko Sueoka-Aragane; Kentaro Iwanaga; Norio Ureshino; Kazutoshi Komiya; Tomomi Nakamura; Chiho Nakashima; Tomonori Abe; Hisashi Matsunaga; Shinya Kimura
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Comparison of absolute neutrophil to CD4 lymphocyte values as a marker of immunosuppression in cancer patients on cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Madu Anazoeze; Ocheni Sunday; Ibegbulam Obike; Chukwura Awele; Madu Kenechi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 4.  Hematopoietic growth factors: personalization of risks and benefits.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Saveri Bhattacharya; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  A Amadio; R Burkes; T Bailie; M McLean; B Coleman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Advances in the treatment of neutropenia.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.302

7.  Skin and soft tissue infections in patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  Diamantis P Kofteridis; Antonios Valachis; Eirini Koutsounaki; Sofia Maraki; Eleni Mavrogeni; Foteini N Economidou; Dimitra Dimopoulou; Kostas Kalbakis; Vassilis Georgoulias; George Samonis
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-02-01

8.  Effect of an exercise training intervention with resistance bands on blood cell counts during chemotherapy for lung cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristina H Karvinen; David Esposito; Thomas D Raedeke; Joshua Vick; Paul R Walker
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-08

9.  Pattern of CD4 T-lymphocyte Values in Cancer Patients on Cytotoxic Therapy.

Authors:  Aj Madu; S Ocheni; Og Ibegbulam; En Aguwa; Ka Madu
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-10

10.  Severe Neutropenia is Associated with Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Who Receive Modified FOLFIRINOX Therapy.

Authors:  Yunami Yamada; Hironori Fujii; Daichi Watanabe; Hiroko Kato-Hayashi; Koichi Ohata; Ryo Kobayashi; Takuma Ishihara; Shinya Uemura; Takuji Iwashita; Masahito Shimizu; Akio Suzuki
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.