Literature DB >> 18181000

An aggressive approach to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas is warranted: margin status does not impact survival after resection.

Jonathan Hernandez1, Sarah M Cowgill, Sam Al-Saadi, Desiree Villadolid, Sharona Ross, Emily Kraemer, Mark Shapiro, John Mullinax, Jennifer Cooper, Steven Goldin, Emmanuel Zervos, Alexander Rosemurgy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With cholangiocarcinoma, the only hope of a cure is resection. This study was undertaken to determine the impact of margin status, stage, tumor location, and adjuvant therapy on survival after resection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
METHODS: From 1985-2006, 91 patients underwent resections of cholangiocarcinomas. Margin status was codified as micro-/macroscopically negative, microscopically positive/ macroscopically negative, or micro-/macroscopically positive. Stage was determined using the AJCC classification (6th edition). Tumor location was classified as proximal, mid, or distal. Proximal tumors were resected by extrahepatic biliary resection with/without concomitant hepatic resection (n = 48), distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas by pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 35), and mid tumors by extrahepatic biliary resection alone (n = 8). Regression analysis and survival curve analysis were utilized. Data are presented as median, mean +/- standard deviation (SD).
RESULTS: Overall survival after resection was 21 months, 38 +/- 46.0. Survival was not impacted by margin status (R0 20 months, 35 +/- 45.1 versus R1 32 months, 45 +/- 49.4). AJCC stage inversely correlated with survival (p = 0.004, Spearman regression analysis). Tumor location did not impact upon survival (p = 0.57, log-rank test). For proximal tumors, survival after biliary resection was significantly impacted by the need for concomitant hepatectomy (15 months, 27 +/- 31.4 versus 41 months, 67 +/- 17.1). Utilization of adjuvant therapy significantly improved survival (33 months, 56 +/- 63.1 versus 19 months, 33 +/- 40.0) (p = 0.046, Spearman regression).
CONCLUSIONS: Survival after resection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is significantly impacted by AJCC stage, the use of adjuvant therapy, and in patients with proximal tumors, the need for concomitant hepatectomy. Margin status and tumor location do not impact survival. Cholangiocarcinomas should be aggressively resected irrespective of tumor location, even if resection might result in microscopically positive margins, and adjuvant therapy applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181000     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9756-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant therapy increases survival after biliary tract cancer resection with wide negative margins.

Authors:  Evan S Glazer; Ping Liu; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven A Curley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Survival outcome and prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Ekaterina Petrova; Felix Rückert; Sebastian Zach; YinFeng Shen; Jürgen Weitz; Robert Grützmann; Uwe A Wittel; Frank Makowiec; Ulrich T Hopt; Peter Bronsert; Florian Kühn; Bettina M Rau; Roman E Izrailov; Igor E Khatkov; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Louisa Bolm; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck; Ulrich F Wellner; Gabriel Seifert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kurahara; Kosei Maemura; Yuko Mataki; Masahiko Sakoda; Satoshi Iino; Yota Kawasaki; Shinichiro Mori; Yuko Kijima; Shinichi Ueno; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Sonshin Takao; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival.

Authors:  U F Wellner; YinFeng Shen; T Keck; WenYin Jin; Ze Xu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Daijo Hashimoto
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-10

6.  Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of patients with resected proximal and distal lesions.

Authors:  Peter J Allen; Anne S Reiner; Mithat Gonen; David K Klimstra; Leslie H Blumgart; Murray F Brennan; Michael D'Angelica; Ronald Dematteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Actual Long-Term Survival Outcome of 403 Consecutive Patients with Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mee Joo Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Jihoon Chang; Yong Chan Shin; Dooho Lee; Hong Beom Kim; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Clinicopathological analysis and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with a microscopic positive ductal margin.

Authors:  In Woong Han; Jin-Young Jang; Kyoung Bun Lee; Mee Joo Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jae Woo Park; Ye Rim Chang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Naru Kim; Huisong Lee; Seog Ki Min; Hyeon Kook Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  When hepatic-side ductal margin is positive in N+ cases, additional resection of the bile duct is not necessary to render the negative hepatic-side ductal margin during surgery for extrahepatic distal bile duct carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukihiro Iso; Junji Kita; Masato Kato; Mitsugi Shimoda; Keiiehi Kubota
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.