BACKGROUND: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a regional cancer therapy, entails insertion of percutaneous catheters to isolate hepatic vasculature and enable simultaneous hepatic venous hemofiltration of high-dose chemotherapy. PHP has been shown to be safe and to benefit some patients with liver metastases. METHODS: We examined hemodynamic and metabolic changes as well as anesthetic implications during PHP in patients with metastatic liver cancer enrolled in clinical trials of escalating doses of melphalan between 2001 and 2006. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent 136 PHPs with general anesthesia. Diagnoses included neuroendocrine tumors, melanoma, and metastatic carcinomas. Based upon available data derived from all procedures, incorporating multiple procedures per patient, after occlusion of the inferior vena cava and during hepatic perfusion, there were decreases in mean arterial (-15.4 +/- 1 and -7.4 +/- 1 mmHg, respectively) and central venous pressure (-5.4 +/- 0.3 and -5.6 +/- 0.3 mmHg) and increases in heart rate (11 +/- 1 and 13.4 +/- 0.9 bpm) (all p < 0.0001) which resolved with completion of the procedure. During vascular isolation, patients received norepinephrine (13% of procedures), phenylephrine (70%), or both agents (11%). During hepatic perfusion with melphalan, compared to baseline, there were decreases in pH (-0.09 +/- 0.01) and bicarbonate (-3.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/L) (both p < 0.0001) and, upon completion of procedure, increases (2.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) in bicarbonate, compared to values during hepatic perfusion (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PHP therapy can be associated with transient but significant hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations. In order to assure patient comfort and facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment of associated hemodynamic and metabolic changes, we favor administration of general anesthesia, rather than sedation, for patients undergoing PHP.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a regional cancer therapy, entails insertion of percutaneous catheters to isolate hepatic vasculature and enable simultaneous hepatic venous hemofiltration of high-dose chemotherapy. PHP has been shown to be safe and to benefit some patients with liver metastases. METHODS: We examined hemodynamic and metabolic changes as well as anesthetic implications during PHP in patients with metastatic liver cancer enrolled in clinical trials of escalating doses of melphalan between 2001 and 2006. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent 136 PHPs with general anesthesia. Diagnoses included neuroendocrine tumors, melanoma, and metastatic carcinomas. Based upon available data derived from all procedures, incorporating multiple procedures per patient, after occlusion of the inferior vena cava and during hepatic perfusion, there were decreases in mean arterial (-15.4 +/- 1 and -7.4 +/- 1 mmHg, respectively) and central venous pressure (-5.4 +/- 0.3 and -5.6 +/- 0.3 mmHg) and increases in heart rate (11 +/- 1 and 13.4 +/- 0.9 bpm) (all p < 0.0001) which resolved with completion of the procedure. During vascular isolation, patients received norepinephrine (13% of procedures), phenylephrine (70%), or both agents (11%). During hepatic perfusion with melphalan, compared to baseline, there were decreases in pH (-0.09 +/- 0.01) and bicarbonate (-3.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/L) (both p < 0.0001) and, upon completion of procedure, increases (2.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) in bicarbonate, compared to values during hepatic perfusion (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PHP therapy can be associated with transient but significant hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations. In order to assure patient comfort and facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment of associated hemodynamic and metabolic changes, we favor administration of general anesthesia, rather than sedation, for patients undergoing PHP.
Authors: Eleonora M de Leede; Mark C Burgmans; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; Arian R van Erkel; Jaap Vuyk; Ellen Kapiteijn; Cornelis Verhoef; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-07-31 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: T Susanna Meijer; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; M Elske Sitsen; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Mark C Burgmans Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Meghan R Forster; Omar M Rashid; Matthew C Perez; Junsung Choi; Tariq Chaudhry; Jonathan S Zager Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Christian H Martini; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Arian R van Erkel Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Arndt Vogel; Sanjay Gupta; Martin Zeile; Rebecca von Haken; Roland Brüning; Gösta Lotz; Alexander Vahrmeijer; Thomas Vogl; Frank Wacker Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Eleonora M de Leede; Mark C Burgmans; T Susanna Meijer; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; Jaap Vuyk; Arian R van Erkel; Cornelis J H van der Velde; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 2.740