| Literature DB >> 18180537 |
Jyoti Nautiyal1, M L Garg, Manoj Sharma Kumar, Asif Ali Khan, Jarnail S Thakur, Rajesh Kumar.
Abstract
Large number of epidemiological studies to know the effect of air pollution on the general mortality and morbidity, and the cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality are concentrated in USA and Europe. Regional differences in air pollution necessitate regional level health effects studies. Present study is a cross sectional pilot study from India, an Asian country. A sample of population from an industrial town 'Mandi Gobindgarh' and a nonindustrial town 'Morinda' were selected. A cross-sectional household survey was done in both the towns. One hundred subjects were selected from each of the towns. Ambient air quality data was collected for both towns over a period of 10-months to assess seasonal variations. In the present study the average PM10 (particulate matter with < or = 10 microm aerodynamic diameter) levels in Morinda were 99.54 microg/m3 and in Mandi Gobindgarh 161.20 microg/m3. As per NAAQS the permitted levels of PM10 is 50 microg/m3 taken as annual average (arithmetic mean). Elemental analysis of the aerosol samples found the concentration levels to be higher in Mandi- Gobindgarh than Morinda. The population in Gobindgarh shows a higher prevalence of symptoms of angina and cardiovascular disease considered in the study as compared to Morinda. When the same data is viewed in terms of male and female population, the female population is found to show these symptoms marginally higher than their counterparts. Considering the results of present study it can be stated that the increased levels of different pollutants and the higher prevalence of cardiovascular symptoms in Mandi-Gobindgarh (Industrial town) than the Morinda (Non-Industrial town) is because of the association of PM pollution with cardiovascular diseases. Keeping in view the current status of literature, further studies in this direction are needed in a country like India. Such data will also be globally relevant.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18180537 PMCID: PMC3732397 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph200704040002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1:A guideline map of Mandi-Gobindgarh indicating the sampling sites
Age-wise breakup of the population sample for the study sites and demographic trends as per 1991 census
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–30 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 61 | 30.5 | 399.84 | 42.8 |
| 30–45 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 16 | 64 | 32.0 | 264.61 | 28.3 |
| 45–60 | 13 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 47 | 23.5 | 164.16 | 17.57 |
| 60 and above | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 28 | 14.0 | 105.43 | 11.3 |
|
| ||||||||
| Total | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 200 | 100.0 | 934.04 | 100.0 |
An overview of the sampling program, in the two study sites from August 1999 to May 2000
| Number of samples | 25 | 35 |
| Collection time | 12/36 hrs. | 12/36 hrs. |
| Flow rate | 3/8 lt. per min. | 3/8 lt. per min. |
| Levels of PM2.5 | 24–90 μg/m3 | 32–100 μg/m3 |
| Levels of PMCF | 33–102 μg/m3 | 34–126 μg/m3 |
| Average PM2.5 | 42.18 μg/m3 | 70.00 μg/m3 |
| Average PM10 | 99.54 μg/m3 | 161.20 μg/m3 |
Figure 2:Ambient air levels of PM2.5 in the two study sites
Figure 3:Ambient air levels of PM10 in the two study sites
Arithmetic mean concentrations (ng/m3) and standard deviation (σ) of various elements detected in aerosol samples from Mandi-Gobindgarh. MDL stands for minimum detection limit of the PIXE set up at Bhubaneshwar for the aerosol samples in (ng/m3). To calculate the arithmetic mean the concentrations of the elements in the samples where these were below detection limits were taken to be zero.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon (Si) | 80090 | 11288 | 28856 | 0 | 94125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sulphur (S) | 769 | 6315 | 6031 | 0 | 19136 | 901 | 1620 | 0 | 5009 |
| Chlorine (Cl) | 229 | 1897 | 2125 | 0 | 18598 | 5096 | 4228 | 0 | 13910 |
| Potasium (K) | 86 | 2833 | 3243 | 878 | 22339 | 3769 | 3911 | 499 | 15506 |
| Calcium (Ca) | 78 | 713 | 571 | 0 | 3609 | 6054 | 5276 | 1031 | 19428 |
| Titanium (Ti) | 54 | 74 | 83 | 0 | 329 | 612 | 522 | 98 | 1945 |
| Chromium (Cr) | 45 | 92 | 87 | 0 | 258 | 199 | 238 | 0 | 828 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 44 | 140 | 168 | 0 | 3012 | 351 | 313 | 66 | 1221 |
| Iron (Fe) | 15 | 4189 | 4325 | 488 | 14021 | 20931 | 22587 | 3534 | 82239 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 54 | 24 | 35 | 0 | 908 | 105 | 167 | 0 | 522 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 37 | 14707 | 16109 | 1307 | 51808 | 11607 | 13740 | 88 | 44637 |
| Arsenic (As) | 167 | 96 | 175 | 0 | 601 | 384 | 782 | 0 | 2381 |
| Bromine(Br) | 153 | 2960 | 2062 | 44 | 7311 | 227 | 681 | 0 | 2417 |
| Lead (Pb) | 301 | 3783 | 4811 | 0 | 14550 | 1283 | 1952 | 0 | 7304 |
Arithmetic mean concentrations (ng/m3) and standard deviation (σ) of various elements detected in aerosol samples from Morinda. MDL stands for minimum detection limit of the PIXE set up at Bhubaneshwar for the aerosol samples in (ng/m3). To calculate the arithmetic mean the concentrations of the elements in the samples where these were below detection limits were taken to be zero.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon (Si) | 80090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sulphur (S) | 769 | 3602 | 533 | 3264 | 4217 | 298 | 516 | 0 | 894 |
| Chlorine (Cl) | 229 | 1132 | 644 | 667 | 1868 | 3002 | 1991 | 1332 | 5207 |
| Potasium (K) | 86 | 4720 | 3670 | 1595 | 8762 | 3711 | 3160 | 1152 | 7243 |
| Calcium (Ca) | 78 | 643 | 734 | 0 | 1461 | 7816 | 5377 | 2841 | 13522 |
| Titanium (Ti) | 54 | 61 | 90 | 0 | 165 | 746 | 500 | 349 | 1307 |
| Chromium (Cr) | 45 | 187 | 60 | 120 | 236 | 195 | 96 | 99 | 292 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 44 | 127 | 120 | 47 | 265 | 254 | 199 | 60 | 458 |
| Iron (Fe) | 15 | 1611 | 1330 | 726 | 3141 | 10348 | 7926 | 3773 | 19149 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 54 | 41 | 60 | 0 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 37 | 5957 | 7560 | 592 | 14605 | 849 | 385 | 411 | 1139 |
| Arsenic (As) | 167 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bromine(Br) | 153 | 4745 | 203 | 4542 | 4948 | 42 | 37 | 0 | 70 |
| Lead (Pb) | 301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 247 | 428 | 0 | 742 |
Levels of gaseous pollutants in the two sites.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO (ppm) | 0–1 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 1–3 |
| SOx (ppm) | 0 | 0 | 0–1 | 0–2 |
| NOx (ppm) | 0 | 0 | 0–2 | 1–4 |
purely residential
mixed habitat; no separation of residential or industrial zones
National Ambient Air Quality Standards Ref. 1.
| Ozone (O3) | 0.12 ppm (235 μg/m3) | Maximum daily 1h average[ |
|
| ||
| PM10 | 50 μg/m3 | Annual arithmetic mean[ |
| 150 μg/m3 | 24 h[ | |
|
| ||
| Sulphur dioxide (SO2) | 0.03 ppm (80 μg/m3) | Annual arithmetic mean |
| 0.14 ppm (365 μg/m3) | 24 h[ | |
|
| ||
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) | 0.053 ppm (100 μg/m3) | Annual arithmetic mean |
|
| ||
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) | 8 h[ |
| 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) | 1 h[ | |
|
| ||
| Lead (Pb) | 1.5 μg/m3 | Maximum quarterly average |
The primary standard is to protect against adverse health effects.
The O3 standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly average concentrations > 0.12 ppm is ≤ 1 (averaged over the previous three years).
Particulate standards use PM10 as the indicator pollutant. The annual standard is attained when the expected annual arithmetic mean concentration is ≤ 50 μg/m3; the 24 h standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year >150 μg/m3 is ≤ 1.
Not to be exceeded more than once a year.
Prevalence of different susceptibility factors in the male population of different age groups in the two study sites.
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosed hypertension | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Diagnosed diabetes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Asthma | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Stroke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tuberculosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hypertension | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| Diabetes | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Heart problems | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Stroke | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Cancer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Any others | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Prevalence of different susceptibility factors in female population of different age groups in the two study sites.
| Diagnosed hypertension | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Diagnosed diabetes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Asthma | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Stroke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tuberculosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hypertension | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Diabetes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Heart problem | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stroke | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cancer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Any others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Frequency of chest pain and intermittent claudication in the population of different age groups in the two study sites.
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest Pain | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 21 |
| Angina | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Possible infraction | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Intermittent Claudication | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Past medical history (specify) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1(Septal defect) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
(P,0.05)
Frequency of various Minnesota codes in the male population of different age groups in the two study sites.
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-Wave Amplitude | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Axis Deviation QRS-Complex | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| High Amp. R-waves | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| ST-segment depression | 4 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 19 |
| T-wave negativity | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| AV Conduction Defect | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ventricular block | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arrhythmias | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Low QRS amplitude | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ST-elevation | 9 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 20 |
(P<0.05): Site 1: Morinda: Site 2: Gobindgarh
Frequency of various Minnesota codes in the female population of different age groups in the two study sites.
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q & QS Waves | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Axis Deviation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| High Amp. R-waves | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| ST-segment depression | 4 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 38 |
| T-wave negativity | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| AV Conduction Defect | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ventricular block | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Arrhythmias | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Low QRS amplitude | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ST-elevation | 9 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
(P<0.05): Site 1: Morinda: Site 2: Gobindgarh
Figure 4a:A normal ECG tracing from the study sample
Figure 4b:An abnormal ECG tracing from the study sample
Prevalence of major and minor abnormality in the population of the two study sites.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (100) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| Female (100) | 12 | 18 | 6 | 19 |
| Total (200) | 17 | 24 | 12 | 30* |
Abnormality is defined as presence of any major or minor abnormality.
Major abnormality is defined as presence of codes 1-1, 1-2; 4-1, 4-2; 5-1, 5-2; 6-1, 6-2, 7-1, 7-2, 7-4, 8-1, 8-3.
Minor abnormality is defined as presence of codes 1-3, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-3, 5-3, 6-3, 9-1.
Prevalence of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) spectrum in the populations of the two study sites.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (100) | - | - | 5 | 8 | - | 6 |
| Female (100) | 1 | - | 12 | 18 | 1 | 8 |
| Total (200) | 1 | - | 17 | 26 | 1 | 14* |
Definite Myocardial infarction is defined as presence of code 1-1 or 1-2 major Q-waves.
Possible Myocardial infarction is defined as presence of codes 1-1, 1–2, 1–3 (Q/QS waves), 4.1 4.2 (ST-depression), 5.1, 5.2 (T-waves negativity), 6-1, 6-2 (AV-block), 7-1 (LBBB), 7-2 (RBBB), 8-1 (Premature beats), 8-3 (Atrial fibrillation or flutter).
Probable CHD is defined as presence of major Q-waves or Angina Pectoris or clinical diagnosis.
Prevalence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) in the populations of the two study sites.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Male (100) | 1 | 1 |
| Female (100) | 1 | 2 |
| Total (200) | 2 | 3 |
LVH is defined as the presence of codes 3-1 plus (code 4-1, 4-2, 4-3) or (code 5-1, 5-2 or 5-3).
| Code Item | Aspect Analysed |
|---|---|
| 1 | Q & QS waves |
| 2 | QRS axis deviation |
| 3 | High amplitude R waves |
| 4 | ST junction (J) & segment depression |
| 5 | T wave items |
| 6 | AV conduction defect |
| 7 | Ventricular conduction defect |
| 8 | Arrhythmias |
| 9 | ST segment elevation |