Literature DB >> 18180260

Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training.

S A Taylor1, D Burling, M Roddie, L Honeyfield, J McQuillan, P Bassett, S Halligan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incremental effect of focused training on observer performance when using computer-assisted detection (CAD) software to interpret CT colonography (CTC). Six radiologists who were relatively inexperienced with CTC interpretation underwent 1 day of focused training before reading 20 patient datasets with the assistance of CAD software (ColonCAR 1.3, Medicsight PLC). Sensitivity, specificity and interpretation times were determined and compared with previous performance when reading the same datasets but without the benefit of focused training, using the binomial exact test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Per-polyp sensitivity improved after training by 18% overall (95% confidence interval (CI): 14-24%, p<0.001) and was greatest for polyps of 6-9 mm (26%, 95% CI: 18-34%, p<0.001). Absolute sensitivity was 23% (9-36%), 51% (33-71%) and 74% (44-100%) for polyps of <or=5 mm, 6-9 mm and >or=10 mm, respectively. Specificity fell significantly after focused training (median of 5.5 false positives per 20 datasets (interquartile range (IQR): 4-6) post-training vs median of 2.5 (IQR: 1-5) pre-training, p = 0.03). Interpretation time also increased significantly after training (from a median of 9.3 min (IQR: 9.3-14.5 min) to a median of 17.1 min (IQR: 15.4-19.4 min), p = 0.03). In conclusion, one day of training increases observer polyp sensitivity when using CAD for CTC at the expense of increased reporting time and reduction in specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18180260     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/93375459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

1.  Quality assurance and training procedures for computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems in clinical use.

Authors:  Zhimin Huo; Ronald M Summers; Sophie Paquerault; Joseph Lo; Jeffrey Hoffmeister; Samuel G Armato; Matthew T Freedman; Jesse Lin; Shih-Chung Ben Lo; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; David Fryd; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Improved computer-aided detection of small polyps in CT colonography using interpolation for curvature estimation.

Authors:  Jiamin Liu; Suraj Kabadi; Robert Van Uitert; Nicholas Petrick; Rachid Deriche; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Authors:  Paola Scalise; Annalisa Mantarro; Francesca Pancrazi; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 4.  CT colonography: what the gastroenterologist needs to know.

Authors:  Peter N Wylie; David Burling
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-16

5.  Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.

Authors:  Abraham H Dachman; Nancy A Obuchowski; Jeffrey W Hoffmeister; J Louis Hinshaw; Michael I Frew; Thomas C Winter; Robert L Van Uitert; Senthil Periaswamy; Ronald M Summers; Bruce J Hillman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Observer training for computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiography.

Authors:  Diederick W De Boo; François van Hoorn; Joost van Schuppen; Laura Schijf; Maeke J Scheerder; Nicole J Freling; Onno Mets; Michael Weber; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Susan Mallett; Justine McQuillan; Stuart A Taylor; Douglas G Altman; Steve Halligan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.