OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the mechanism whereby a particular deformity of the aortic arch, an angulated Gothic shape, might lead to hypertension late after anatomically successful repair of aortic coarctation. METHODS: Fifty-five normotensive patients with anatomically successful repair of aortic coarctation and either a Gothic (angulated) or a Romanesque (smooth and rounded) arch were studied with magnetic resonance angiography and flow mapping in both the ascending and descending aortas. Systolic waveforms, central aortic stiffness, and pulse velocity were measured. We hypothesized that arch angulation would result in enhanced systolic wave reflection with loss of energy across the aortic arch, as well as increased central aortic stiffness. RESULTS: Twenty patients were found to have a Gothic, and 35 a Romanesque, arch. Patients with a Gothic arch showed markedly augmented systolic wave reflection (12 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 0.3 mL, P < .001) and greater loss of systolic wave height in the distal aorta (30% +/- 16% vs 22% +/- 12%, P < .01) compared with that of subjects with a Romanesque arch. Pulse wave velocity was also increased with a Gothic arch (5.6 +/- 1.1 vs 4.1 +/- 1 m/s, P < .0001), as well as left ventricular mass index (85 +/- 15 vs 77 +/- 20 g/m2). Patients with a Romanesque arch had increased aortic stiffness compared with that of control subjects (stiffness beta-index, 3.9 +/- 0.9 vs 2.9 +/- 1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Angulated Gothic aortic arch is associated with increased systolic wave reflection, as well as increased central aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass index. These findings explain (at least in part) the association between this pattern of arch geometry and late hypertension at rest and on exercise in subjects after coarctation repair.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the mechanism whereby a particular deformity of the aortic arch, an angulated Gothic shape, might lead to hypertension late after anatomically successful repair of aortic coarctation. METHODS: Fifty-five normotensive patients with anatomically successful repair of aortic coarctation and either a Gothic (angulated) or a Romanesque (smooth and rounded) arch were studied with magnetic resonance angiography and flow mapping in both the ascending and descending aortas. Systolic waveforms, central aortic stiffness, and pulse velocity were measured. We hypothesized that arch angulation would result in enhanced systolic wave reflection with loss of energy across the aortic arch, as well as increased central aortic stiffness. RESULTS: Twenty patients were found to have a Gothic, and 35 a Romanesque, arch. Patients with a Gothic arch showed markedly augmented systolic wave reflection (12 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 0.3 mL, P < .001) and greater loss of systolic wave height in the distal aorta (30% +/- 16% vs 22% +/- 12%, P < .01) compared with that of subjects with a Romanesque arch. Pulse wave velocity was also increased with a Gothic arch (5.6 +/- 1.1 vs 4.1 +/- 1 m/s, P < .0001), as well as left ventricular mass index (85 +/- 15 vs 77 +/- 20 g/m2). Patients with a Romanesque arch had increased aortic stiffness compared with that of control subjects (stiffness beta-index, 3.9 +/- 0.9 vs 2.9 +/- 1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Angulated Gothic aortic arch is associated with increased systolic wave reflection, as well as increased central aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass index. These findings explain (at least in part) the association between this pattern of arch geometry and late hypertension at rest and on exercise in subjects after coarctation repair.
Authors: Diego Porras; David W Brown; Audrey C Marshall; Pedro Del Nido; Emile A Bacha; Doff B McElhinney Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sarah T Plummer; Christoph P Hornik; Hamilton Baker; Gregory A Fleming; Susan Foerster; M Eric Ferguson; Andrew C Glatz; Russel Hirsch; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Kyong-Jin Lee; Alan B Lewis; Jennifer S Li; Mary Martin; Diego Porras; Wolfgang A K Radtke; John F Rhodes; Julie A Vincent; Jeffrey D Zampi; Kevin D Hill Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Laura J Olivieri; Diane A de Zélicourt; Christopher M Haggerty; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Russell R Cross; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Elaine M Urbina; Lawrence M Dolan; Connie E McCoy; Philip R Khoury; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas R Kimball Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Oladipupo Olafiranye; Mediha Ibrahim; Haroon Kamran; Kinda Venner-Jones; Samy I McFarlane; Louis Salciccioli; Jason M Lazar Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Alban Redheuil; Wen-Chung Yu; Colin O Wu; Elie Mousseaux; Alain de Cesare; Raymond Yan; Nadjia Kachenoura; David Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 10.190