Quanliang Shang1,2, Samir Sarikouch3, Shivani Patel1, Andreas Schuster4, Michael Steinmetz5, Phalla Ou6, David A Danford1, Philipp Beerbaum3, Shelby Kutty7. 1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska College of Medicine and Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 8200, Dodge Street, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. 3. Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 4. Department of Cardiology and Pneumonology, Georg-August-University and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK, Partner Site), Göttingen, Germany. 5. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Georg-August-University and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK, Partner Site), Göttingen, Germany. 6. University Paris Diderot, Department of Radiology, Hospital Bichat, APHP, Paris, France. 7. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska College of Medicine and Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 8200, Dodge Street, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA. skutty@unmc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In patients with repaired coarctation of aorta (CoA), we assessed ventriculo-vascular characteristics using CMR-derived aortic area strain (AAS), left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) longitudinal and circumferential strain (LS, CS). METHODS: Seventy-five subjects including 50 with repaired CoA divided into hypertensive (n = 25), normotensive (n = 25) and 25 controls were studied. AAS was measured at 3 levels: ascending aorta, proximal descending and descending aorta. LA and LV LS were measured using CMR-feature tracking. LA and LV end-diastolic volumes, ejection fraction (EF) and mass were measured. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 19.7 ± 6.7 and controls 23 ± 15 (years). All strains (LA, LV, ascending and descending aortic) were lower in CoA subgroups compared to controls except the AAS at diaphragm, which was not different. Comparisons between hypertensive and normotensive CoA showed no differences in LV mass, LV volumetric indices, and LA and LV strain indices; however, ascending AAS was lower in hypertensive subgroup (p = 0.02). Ascending AAS was correlated with LV mass (r = -0.4, p = 0.005), LVEF (r = -0.4, p = 0.004), systolic blood pressure (r = -0.5, p = 0.0001) and LVLS (r = 0.5, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ascending AAS correlated with LV mass, EF and LVLS. In hypertensive CoA, ascending AAS was reduced compared to normotensive CoA and controls, indicating vascular remodelling differences influenced by ongoing hypertension. KEY POINTS: • Impaired arterial strain is a measure of increased stiffness in arteries • Ascending aorta strain correlates with left ventricular mass and longitudinal strain • Ascending aorta strain is significantly lower in hypertensive coarctation patients • Hypertension may be a consequence of vascular pathology persisting despite repair.
OBJECTIVES: In patients with repaired coarctation of aorta (CoA), we assessed ventriculo-vascular characteristics using CMR-derived aortic area strain (AAS), left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) longitudinal and circumferential strain (LS, CS). METHODS: Seventy-five subjects including 50 with repaired CoA divided into hypertensive (n = 25), normotensive (n = 25) and 25 controls were studied. AAS was measured at 3 levels: ascending aorta, proximal descending and descending aorta. LA and LV LS were measured using CMR-feature tracking. LA and LV end-diastolic volumes, ejection fraction (EF) and mass were measured. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 19.7 ± 6.7 and controls 23 ± 15 (years). All strains (LA, LV, ascending and descending aortic) were lower in CoA subgroups compared to controls except the AAS at diaphragm, which was not different. Comparisons between hypertensive and normotensive CoA showed no differences in LV mass, LV volumetric indices, and LA and LV strain indices; however, ascending AAS was lower in hypertensive subgroup (p = 0.02). Ascending AAS was correlated with LV mass (r = -0.4, p = 0.005), LVEF (r = -0.4, p = 0.004), systolic blood pressure (r = -0.5, p = 0.0001) and LVLS (r = 0.5, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ascending AAS correlated with LV mass, EF and LVLS. In hypertensive CoA, ascending AAS was reduced compared to normotensive CoA and controls, indicating vascular remodelling differences influenced by ongoing hypertension. KEY POINTS: • Impaired arterial strain is a measure of increased stiffness in arteries • Ascending aorta strain correlates with left ventricular mass and longitudinal strain • Ascending aorta strain is significantly lower in hypertensive coarctationpatients • Hypertension may be a consequence of vascular pathology persisting despite repair.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adult congenital heart disease; Aortic strain; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Coarctation of the aorta; Paediatric cardiology
Authors: Kan N Hor; William M Gottliebson; Christopher Carson; Erin Wash; James Cnota; Robert Fleck; Janaka Wansapura; Piotr Klimeczek; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Eugene S Chung; D Woodrow Benson; Wojciech Mazur Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02
Authors: Shelby Kutty; Sheela Rangamani; Jeeva Venkataraman; Ling Li; Andreas Schuster; Scott E Fletcher; David A Danford; Philipp Beerbaum Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Elles J Dijkema; Martijn G Slieker; Johannes M P J Breur; Tim Leiner; Heynric B Grotenhuis Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Jose D Martins; Justin Zachariah; Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Uyen Truong; Shaine A Morris; Shelby Kutty; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jonathan Rhodes; Marta Antonio; Maria Guarino; Boban Thomas; Diana Oliveira; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Nuno Jalles; Tal Geva; Miguel Carmo; Ashwin Prakash Journal: Ann Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018 Sep-Dec
Authors: José D Martins; Justin Zachariah; Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Uyen Truong; Shaine A Morris; Shelby Kutty; Sarah D de Ferranti; Maria Guarino; Boban Thomas; Diana Oliveira; António Marinho; Marta António; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Nuno Jalles; Tal Geva; Miguel M Carmo; Ashwin Prakash Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.501