Literature DB >> 18179793

Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database.

Amnon Sonnenberg1, Stacey L Amorosi, Michael J Lacey, David A Lieberman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patterns of GI endoscopy are influenced by the underlying epidemiology of GI disease, as well as by policy and practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To compare practice patterns of GI endoscopy between two large national databases of the United States.
DESIGN: Descriptive database analysis.
SETTING: A 5% sample of the entire U.S. Medicare population (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS data files) and endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, CORI database) from 1999 to 2003. PATIENTS: The study population included 1,121,215 Medicare and 635,573 CORI patients undergoing various types of GI endoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: EGD, colonoscopy, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patient demographics, endoscopic diagnoses, time trends of diagnoses.
RESULTS: A colonoscopy was the most common endoscopic procedure performed (CMS 53%, CORI 58%), followed by an EGD (37%, 32%), and a flexible sigmoidoscopy (10%, 10%). In the CMS data, women accounted for 59% of the EGDs, 57% of the colonoscopies, and 56% of the flexible sigmoidoscopies, and in the CORI data, the corresponding numbers were 57%, 55%, and 54%, respectively. Compared with their distribution in the U.S. census population, nonwhite patients in both databases underwent relatively more EGDs and fewer colonoscopies. The most common upper-GI diagnosis was GERD, followed by GI bleeding, gastric ulcer, and duodenal ulcer. The most common lower-GI diagnosis was colorectal polyp. Over the period of 1999 to 2003, the rates of colorectal cancer diagnosed with colonoscopy declined. LIMITATIONS: Only a limited amount of information about individual patients was retrievable from the electronic databases.
CONCLUSIONS: A colonoscopy is now the most common endoscopic procedure in the United States. Women undergo both upper and lower endoscopic procedures more often than men. Nonwhite patients are underrepresented in the use of colonoscopy relative to the prevalence of nonwhite persons in the U.S. population. Increased use of a colonoscopy for colon screening and surveillance has been associated with a decreased rate of cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18179793     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  38 in total

1.  Outcomes research in gastroenterology and endoscopy.

Authors:  Parantap Gupta; Jonathan M Buscaglia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

Review 2.  Quality in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Katherine T Brunner; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-10

3.  Low rate of large polyps (>9 mm) within 10 years after an adequate baseline colonoscopy with no polyps.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia D Morris; Judith Logan; J Lucas Williams; Patricia Carney
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Improving quality in cancer screening: the excellence report for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Judith R Logan; Jennifer L Holub; Dawn Peters; Anke Brandstater
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

Review 5.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

6.  Regional differences in healthcare delivery for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Predictive overbooking and active recruitment increases uptake of endoscopy appointments among African American patients.

Authors:  Folasade P May; Mark W Reid; Samuel Cohen; Francis Dailey; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Proximal and distal colorectal cancer resection rates in the United States since widespread screening by colonoscopy.

Authors:  Parvathi A Myer; Ajitha Mannalithara; Gurkirpal Singh; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  State of the Art Review: Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Joseph A Diaz; Teresa Slomka
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2011-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.