Literature DB >> 18179669

The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries.

Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer1, Angela Gosch, Luis Rajmil, Michael Erhart, Jeanet Bruil, Mick Power, Wolfgang Duer, Pascal Auquier, Bernhard Cloetta, Ladislav Czemy, Joanna Mazur, Agnes Czimbalmos, Yannis Tountas, Curt Hagquist, Jean Kilroe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the reliability and validity of the European KIDSCREEN-52 generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for children and adolescents. RESEARCH
DESIGN: The KIDSCREEN-52, which measures HRQoL in 10 dimensions, was administered to a representative sample of 22,827 children and adolescents (8 to 18 years) in 13 European countries. Psychometric properties were assessed using the Classical Test Theory approach, Rasch analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). A priori expected associations between KIDSCREEN scales and sociodemographic and health-related factors were examined. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 10 countries.
RESULTS: For the overall sample, Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.77 to 0.89. Scaling success (Multitrait Analysis Program) was >97.8% for all dimensions and Rasch analysis item fit (INFITmsq) ranged from 0.80 to 1.27. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.77. No sizeable differential item functioning (DIF) was found by age, sex or health status. Four items showed DIF across countries. The specified SEM fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation: 0.06, comparative fit index: 0.98). Correlation coefficients between Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition, and Youth Quality of Life Instrument scales and KIDSCREEN dimensions assessing similar constructs were moderate for those (r = 0.44 to 0.61). Statistically significant differences between children with and without physical and mental health problems (Children with Special Health Care Needs screener: d = 0.17 to 0.42, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: d = 0.32 to 0.72) were found in all dimensions. All dimensions showed a gradient according to socioeconomic status.
CONCLUSIONS: The KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire has acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Further work is needed to assess longitudinal validity and sensitivity to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18179669     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  131 in total

1.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Environmental risk and protective factors of adolescents' and youths' mental health: differences between parents' appraisal and self-reports.

Authors:  Ester Villalonga-Olives; Carlos Garcia Forero; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Josué Almansa; Jorge A Palacio Vieira; Jose M Valderas; Montserrat Ferrer; Luis Rajmil; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Quality of life in overweight and obese children and adolescents: a literature review.

Authors:  Marie Buttitta; Catalina Iliescu; Amélie Rousseau; Alain Guerrien
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Relationship between cyberbullying and health-related quality of life in a sample of children and adolescents.

Authors:  J González-Cabrera; A León-Mejía; M Beranuy; M Gutiérrez-Ortega; A Alvarez-Bardón; J M Machimbarrena
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire for children/adolescents and parents/proxies.

Authors:  Satoko Nezu; Hidemi Iwasaka; Keigo Saeki; Rika Ishizuka; Hideyo Goma; Nozomi Okamoto; Hiroko Makino; Masami Tanimura; Kazumi Yoshizaki; Kenji Obayashi; Norio Kurumatani
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  The Child & Youth CompreHensIve Longitudinal Database for Deep Brain Stimulation (CHILD-DBS).

Authors:  Han Yan; Lauren Siegel; Sara Breitbart; Carolina Gorodetsky; Hernan D Gonorazky; Ivanna Yau; Cristina Go; Elizabeth Donner; Suneil K Kalia; Alfonso Fasano; Alexander G Weil; Aria Fallah; George M Ibrahim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Gisela Michel; Corinna Bisegger; Daniela C Fuhr; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D.

Authors:  Nora Wille; Xavier Badia; Gouke Bonsel; Kristina Burström; Gulia Cavrini; Nancy Devlin; Ann-Charlotte Egmar; Wolfgang Greiner; Narcis Gusi; Michael Herdman; Jennifer Jelsma; Paul Kind; Luciana Scalone; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Health related quality of life of Dutch children: psychometric properties of the PedsQL in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Vivian Engelen; Marleen M Haentjens; Symone B Detmar; Hendrik M Koopman; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Effect on health-related quality of life of changes in mental health in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Luis Rajmil; Jorge A Palacio-Vieira; Michael Herdman; Sílvia López-Aguilà; Ester Villalonga-Olives; Josep M Valderas; Mireia Espallargues; Jordi Alonso
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.