Literature DB >> 18179460

Evaluating the sexual experience in men: validation of the sexual experience questionnaire.

John P Mulhall1, Rosie King, Michael Kirby, Kyle Hvidsten, Tara Symonds, Andrew G Bushmakin, Joseph C Cappelleri.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The absence of a single brief measure that assesses function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) hinders evaluation of the sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To psychometrically analyze the Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX-Q).
METHODS: Two data sets were studied. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of flexible-dose sildenafil for ED treatment provided the final clinical trial data set (213 men enrolled, 4 of whom did not receive treatment) and the interim clinical trial data set (190 men screened and 165 men enrolled). The survey data set consisted of 902 respondents to a U.S. community health survey, of whom two-thirds had ED and one-third did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality and distribution of responses, comparative fit, item-level discriminant testing, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), known-groups validity (vs. International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] ED severity groups), convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients with scores on the IIEF, Self-Esteem and Relationship [SEAR] questionnaire, and Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ]), responsiveness, and clinically important difference (CID).
RESULTS: The original 15 items were reduced to 12 items in three domains (erection, individual satisfaction, and couple satisfaction), which demonstrated good quality responses for all items; a strong factor structure; excellent internal consistency; good test-retest reliability; clear known-groups validity across the severity groups; moderate to strong convergent validity against the IIEF, SEAR, and QEQ; and high treatment responsiveness. The estimated CID ranged from 16.0 to 22.3 across domains.
CONCLUSIONS: The SEX-Q is the first questionnaire to solely and exclusively combine functional and HRQoL concepts (erection, individual satisfaction, and couple satisfaction domains) in a brief questionnaire, which allows a more focused and less burdensome evaluation of the sexual experience, making it a potentially useful measure for clinical trial research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18179460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

1.  Determining clinically important changes in range of motion in patients with Dupuytren's Contracture: secondary analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CORD I study.

Authors:  Jörg Witthaut; Andrew G Bushmakin; Robert A Gerber; Joseph C Cappelleri; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples' sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Laurel Northouse; Heather Crossley; David Miller; Rodney Dunn; Jennifer Nidetz; Jeanne Montie; Mia Moyad; Katie Lavin; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2014-01-09

3.  Enhanced understanding of the relationship between erection and satisfaction in ED treatment: application of a longitudinal mediation model.

Authors:  A G Bushmakin; J C Cappelleri; T Symonds; V J Stecher
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Hardness, function, emotional well-being, satisfaction and the overall sexual experience in men using 100-mg fixed-dose or flexible-dose sildenafil citrate.

Authors:  P Ströberg; J C Kaminetsky; N C Park; E R Goldfischer; D L Creanga; V J Stecher
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Effects of a Novel Erectogenic Condom on Men and Women's Sexual Pleasure: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  M F Gallo; N C Nguyen; A Luff; T N Luong; V T Le; J Casterline; R Andridge
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  The 'Pleasure&Pregnancy' web-based interactive educational programme versus expectant management in the treatment of unexplained subfertility: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eline A F Dancet; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Felicia Dreischor; Madelon van Wely; Ellen T M Laan; Cornelius B Lambalk; Sjoerd Repping; Inge M Custers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Is it time for a time-out? Progress versus politics in studying the psychosexual implications of penile circumcision.

Authors:  Beatriz Bañuelos Marco
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.