Literature DB >> 18179347

Optimally matching support and perceived spousal sensitivity.

Carolyn E Cutrona1, Philip A Shaffer, Kristin A Wesner, Kelli A Gardner.   

Abstract

Partner sensitivity is an important antecedent of both intimacy (H. T. Reis & P. Shaver, 1988) and attachment (M. D. S. Ainsworth, 1989). On the basis of the optimal matching model of social support (C. E. Cutrona & D. Russell, 1990), support behaviors that "matched" the support goals of the stressed individual were predicted to lead to the perception of partner sensitivity. Predictions were tested with 59 married couples, who engaged in a videotaped self-disclosure task. Matching support was defined as the disclosure of emotions followed by emotional support or a request for information followed by informational support. Partial evidence was found for the predictions. Matching support following the disclosure of emotions was predictive of perceived partner sensitivity. Mismatched support following the disclosure of emotions predicted lower marital satisfaction, through the mediation of partner sensitivity. Matching support following a request for information was not predictive of perceived partner sensitivity, but negative partner responses (e.g., criticism or sarcasm) following a request for information negatively predicted perceptions of partner sensitivity. The importance of considering the context of support transactions is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18179347     DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  18 in total

1.  "Have a drink, you'll feel better." Predictors of daily alcohol consumption among extraverts: the mediational role of coping.

Authors:  Cameron T McCabe; Scott C Roesch; Arianna A Aldridge-Gerry
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2012-02-07

2.  Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.

Authors:  Yuthika U Girme; Michael R Maniaci; Harry T Reis; James K McNulty; Cheryl L Carmichael; Shelly L Gable; Levi R Baker; Nickola C Overall
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-09-13

3.  The interplay between partners' responsiveness and patients' need for emotional expression in couples coping with cancer.

Authors:  Meirav Dagan; Robbert Sanderman; Christiaan Hoff; W J H Jeroen Meijerink; Peter C Baas; Michiel van Haastert; Mariët Hagedoorn
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-10-10

4.  Health care provider perspectives on informal supporters' involvement in HIV care.

Authors:  Katie E Mosack; Angela R Wendorf
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-06-27

5.  Effects of pain controllability and discrepancy in social support on depressed mood among patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Sungkun Cho; Ira D Zunin; Puihan J Chao; Elaine M Heiby; James McKoy
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-09

6.  Creating good relationships: responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals.

Authors:  Amy Canevello; Jennifer Crocker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-07

7.  Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being.

Authors:  Sylvia A Morelli; Ihno A Lee; Molly E Arnn; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-06-22

8.  Spousal understanding and marital satisfaction in pain patients and their spouses.

Authors:  Ashley M Tate; Lynn M Martire; Ruixue Zhaoyang
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  2019-02-22

9.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08

10.  Too much of a good thing: underprovision versus overprovision of partner support.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brock; Erika Lawrence
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.