Literature DB >> 18178633

Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform.

E Aston1, H Whitby, T Maxwell, N Glaus, B Cowley, D Lowry, X L Zhu, B Issa, S T South, A R Brothman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The University of Utah Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray Laboratory was one of the first US laboratories to offer comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) microarray testing using a commercial platform in a clinical setting. Results for 1076 patients (1598 chips) are presented.
METHODS: The Spectral Genomics/PerkinElmer Constitutional Chip (targeted array), SpectralChip 2600 (whole genome array) and a "Combo" chip (both arrays run simultaneously) were the tests offered. Abnormal results were confirmed by an alternative method, most often fluorescence in situ hybridisation.
RESULTS: In 669 cases with known normal cytogenetics, an abnormal detection rate of 10.8% was observed, (5.3%, 12.2% and 14.1% for the Constitutional Chip, SpectralChip 2600 and Combo assay, respectively). Known copy number variants and single clone abnormalities are not included in these rates. Single clone abnormalities are reported separately. For 1076 total cases, we report an average abnormal rate of 16.9% (8.7%, 23.7% and 18.6% for the three assays). This rate includes characterisation of some abnormalities previously identified by cytogenetics.
CONCLUSIONS: CGH microarray provides a likely aetiology for the clinical phenotype in many cytogenetically normal cases, and a whole genome array generally identifies copy number changes more effectively than a targeted chip alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178633     DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2007.055319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of LOINC for representing constitutional cytogenetic test result reports.

Authors:  Yan Z Heras; Joyce A Mitchell; Marc S Williams; Arthur R Brothman; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

Review 2.  Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Melissa S Savage; Mirella J Mourad; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  Tracy Tucker; Alexandre Montpetit; David Chai; Susanna Chan; Sébastien Chénier; Bradley P Coe; Allen Delaney; Patrice Eydoux; Wan L Lam; Sylvie Langlois; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Marco Marra; Hong Qian; Guy A Rouleau; David Vincent; Jacques L Michaud; Jan M Friedman
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Benign copy number changes in clinical cytogenetic diagnostics by array CGH.

Authors:  H Whitby; A Tsalenko; E Aston; P Tsang; S Mitchell; P Bayrak-Toydemir; C Hopkins; G Peters; D K Bailey; L Bruhn; A R Brothman
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Recurrent copy number changes in mentally retarded children harbour genes involved in cellular localization and the glutamate receptor complex.

Authors:  Martin Poot; Marc J Eleveld; Ruben van 't Slot; Hans Kristian Ploos van Amstel; Ron Hochstenbach
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Amelia L M Sutton; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Sequence characteristics define trade-offs between on-target and genome-wide off-target hybridization of oligoprobes.

Authors:  Olga V Matveeva; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Nafisa N Nazipova; Svetlana A Shabalina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection of pathogenic copy number variants in children with idiopathic intellectual disability using 500 K SNP array genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Jm Friedman; Shelin Adam; Laura Arbour; Linlea Armstrong; Agnes Baross; Patricia Birch; Cornelius Boerkoel; Susanna Chan; David Chai; Allen D Delaney; Stephane Flibotte; William T Gibson; Sylvie Langlois; Emmanuelle Lemyre; H Irene Li; Patrick MacLeod; Joan Mathers; Jacques L Michaud; Barbara C McGillivray; Millan S Patel; Hong Qian; Guy A Rouleau; Margot I Van Allen; Siu-Li Yong; Farah R Zahir; Patrice Eydoux; Marco A Marra
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Microarray experiments and factors which affect their reliability.

Authors:  Roman Jaksik; Marta Iwanaszko; Joanna Rzeszowska-Wolny; Marek Kimmel
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.