| Literature DB >> 18178572 |
Gopal K R Soppa1, Joon Lee, Mark A Stagg, Leanne E Felkin, Paul J R Barton, Urszula Siedlecka, Samuel Youssef, Magdi H Yacoub, Cesare M N Terracciano.
Abstract
AIMS: Combined left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and pharmacological therapy has been proposed to favour myocardial recovery in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Clenbuterol (Clen), a beta(2)-adrenoceptor (beta(2)-AR) agonist, has been used as a part of this strategy. In this study, we investigated the direct effects of clenbuterol on unloaded myocardium in HF. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18178572 PMCID: PMC5436743 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvm106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Res ISSN: 0008-6363 Impact factor: 10.787
Echocardiographic parameters measured in experimental groups
| Sham | Sham + Sal | HF | HF + Sal | HF | HF + Clen | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 79.0 ± 1.4 [12] | 81.1 ± 1.9 [11] | 35.9 ± 2.4 [11]*** | 41.7 ± 1.8 [10]*** | 35.9 ± 2 [16]*** | 52.1 ± 1.4 [16]***††† | |
| LV fractional shortening (%) | 44.7 ± 1.8 [12] | 48.3 ± 2.1 [10] | 18.9 ± 1.6 [11]*** | 18.0 ± 1.3 [9]*** | 18.9 ± 0.9 [15]*** | 24.7 ± 1.1 [16]***†† | |
| LV diameter (cm) | |||||||
| Diastole | 0.71 ± 0.02 [12] | 0.73 ± 0.02 [11] | 0.98 ± 0.02 [11]*** | 0.98 ± 0.01 [9]*** | 0.96 ± 0.02 [15]*** | 1.02 ± 0.03 [16]*** | |
| Systole | 0.39 ± 0.02 [12] | 0.37 ± 0.02 [11] | 0.79 ± 0.02 [11]*** | 0.81 ± 0.02 [9]*** | 0.78 ± 0.02 [15]*** | 0.78 ± 0.03 [16]*** | |
| LV posterior wall thickness (cm) | |||||||
| Diastole | 0.23 ± 0.02 [12] | 0.23 ± 0.01 [11] | 0.18 ± 0.01 [11]* | 0.21 ± 0.02 [9] | 0.18 ± 0.01 [15]* | 0.20 ± 0.01 [16] | |
| Systole | 0.31 ± 0.01 [12] | 0.32 ± 0.01 [11] | 0.25 ± 0.01 [11]** | 0.27 ± 0.02 [9] | 0.25 ± 01 [15]*** | 0.30 ± 0.01 [16]††† | |
| LV anterior wall thickness (cm) | |||||||
| Diastole | 0.17 ± 0.01 [12] | 0.16 ± 0.01 [11] | 0.10 ± 0.01 [11]*** | 0.10 ± 0.01 [9]*** | 0.13 ± 0.01 [15]*** | 0.12 ± 0.01 [16] | |
| Systole | 0.29 ± 0.01 [12] | 0.30 ± 0.01 [11] | 0.12 ± 0.01 [11]*** | 0.11 ± 0.01 [9]*** | 0.14 ± 0.01 [15]*** | 0.15 ± 0.01 [16]*** |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. Sham; ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 HF vs. HF + Clen. (data in [] indicates number of hearts studied).
Contractile and calcium handling parameters in experimental groups
| Sham + Sal | HF + Sal | HF + Clen | HF + UN + Sal | HF + UN + Clen | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Hz Sarcomere shortening | ||||||
| Baseline SL (µm) | 1.63 ± 0.02 [46] | 1.59 ± 0.01 [68]* | 1.64 ± 0.01 [69]†† | 1.59 ± 0.01 [38] | 1.64 ± 0.01 [50]††,§ | |
| Amplitude (µm) | 0.08 ± 0.01 [46] | 0.07 ± 0.01 [68]* | 0.1 ± 0.01 [69]††† | 0.07 ± 0.01 [38] | 0.1 ± 0.01 [50]†††,§§§ | |
| Time to peak (ms) | 86.9 ± 3.3 [46] | 102.6 ± 2.6 [68]*** | 84.9 ± 2.3 [69]††† | 97.8 ± 2.7 [38] | 71.9 ± 1.7 [50]†††,§§§ | |
| Time to 50% relaxation (ms) | 70.5 ± 5.7 [42] | 91.2 ± 6.1 [65]* | 53.6 ± 2.4 [68]††† | 90.0 ± 6.2 [38] | 46.0 ± 2.2 [50]†††,§§§ | |
| 1 Hz Ca2+ transient | ||||||
| Baseline (Indo-1 ratio units) | 0.31 ± 0.01 [45] | 0.33 ± 0.01 [67]** | 0.33 ± 0.01 [69] | 0.31 ± 0.01 [38] | 0.32 ± 0.01 [48] | |
| Amplitude (Indo-1 ratio units) | 0.12 ± 0.01 [45] | 0.15 ± 0.01 [67]** | 0.14 ± 0.01 [69] | 0.14 ± 0.01 [38] | 0.11 ± 0.01 [48]†††,§§ | |
| Time to peak (ms) | 33.3 ± 1.1 [45] | 36.4 ± 0.6 [67]** | 34.6 ± 0.7 [69] | 34.9 ± 1.1 [38] | 31.2 ± 0.7 [47]†††,§§ | |
| Time to 50% decay (ms) | 70.9 ± 1.5 [45] | 75.4 ± 1.4 [66]* | 68.5 ± 1.1 [69]††† | 74.3 ± 1.9 [38] | 62.5 ± 1.4 [48]†††,§§§ | |
| Indo-1 decay, τ (ms) | 76.4 ± 2.9 [45] | 88.2 ± 3.4 [66]* | 65.8 ± 2.2 [69]††† | 83.1 ± 3.8 [38] | 58.5 ± 1.3 [48]†††,§§§ | |
| Caffeine induced Ca2+ transient | ||||||
| SR Ca2+ content (Indo-1 ratio units) | 0.11 ± 0.01 [29] | 0.14 ± 0.01 [43]** | 0.14 ± 0.004 [41] | 0.14 ± 0.01 [26] | 0.11 ± 0.01 [34]†,§ | |
| Indo-1 decay, τ (s) | 1.21 ± 0.08 [22] | 1.44 ± 0.06 [42]* | 1.21 ± 0.07 [35]†† | 1.20 ± 0.07 [23]† | 1.14 ± 0.07 [26]†† | |
| Myofilament sensitivity to Ca2+ | ||||||
| Slope value (µm/ratio unit) | 2.23 ± 0.27 [35] | 1.65 ± 0.12 [66]* | 2.36 ± 0.18 [69]†† | 1.42 ± 0.13 [38] | 2.13 ± 0.2 [52]†,§ |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 HF + Sal vs. Sham + Sal; †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 vs. HF + Sal; §P < 0.05, §§P < 0.01, §§§P < 0.001, HF + UN + Sal vs. HF + UN + Clen (data in [] indicates number of cells studied).