Literature DB >> 17485581

Cardiac improvement during mechanical circulatory support: a prospective multicenter study of the LVAD Working Group.

Simon Maybaum1, Donna Mancini, Steve Xydas, Randall C Starling, Keith Aaronson, Francis D Pagani, Leslie W Miller, Kenneth Margulies, Susan McRee, O H Frazier, Guillermo Torre-Amione.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support has been reported. The LVAD Working Group Recovery Study was a prospective multicenter trial to assess the incidence of myocardial recovery in patients bridged to cardiac transplantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: After LVAD implantation, patients were evaluated with the use of rest echocardiograms with partial LVAD support and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Dobutamine echocardiography with hemodynamic measurements was performed in those patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% during resting studies. Histological analysis was performed on myocardial samples taken at LVAD implantation and explantation. Sixty-seven LVAD patients with heart failure participated in the study. After 30 days, significant improvement occurred in left ventricular ejection fraction (17+/-7% versus 34+/-12%; P<0.001) and reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (7.1+/-1.2 versus 5.1+/-1.1 cm; P<0.001) and left ventricular mass (320+/-113 versus 194+/-79 g; P<0.001) compared with before LVAD. Thirty-four percent of patients had left ventricular ejection fraction >40% with partial device support. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased over time to pre-LVAD measurement by 120 days. Peak VO2 improved with mechanical support (13.7+/-4.2 versus 18.9+/-5.5 mL/kg per minute, 30 versus 120 days; P<0.001). Tissue analysis revealed significant reductions in myocyte size, collagen content, and cardiac tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Six subjects (9%) underwent LVAD explantation for recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac function improves significantly after device implantation. Although cellular recovery and improvement in ventricular function are observed, the degree of clinical recovery is insufficient for device explantation in most patients with chronic heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17485581     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.633180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  112 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support for elderly heart failure patients.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Alteration of LV end-diastolic volume by controlling the power of the continuous-flow LVAD, so it is synchronized with cardiac beat: development of a native heart load control system (NHLCS).

Authors:  Akihide Umeki; Takashi Nishimura; Masahiko Ando; Yoshiaki Takewa; Kenji Yamazaki; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Tomonori Tsukiya; Toshihide Mizuno; Yoshiyuki Taenaka; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Is myocardial recovery possible and how do you measure it?

Authors:  Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Recent Developments in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Sujith Dassanayaka; Steven P Jones
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 7.  Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy.

Authors:  O Wever-Pinzon; J Stehlik; A G Kfoury; J V Terrovitis; N A Diakos; C Charitos; D Y Li; S G Drakos
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular function in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 9.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Structural and functional cardiac profile after prolonged duration of mechanical unloading: potential implications for myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Estibaliz Castillero; Ziad A Ali; Hirokazu Akashi; Nicholas Giangreco; Catherine Wang; Eric J Stöhr; Ruping Ji; Xiaokan Zhang; Nathaniel Kheysin; Joo-Eun S Park; Sheetal Hegde; Sanatkumar Patel; Samantha Stein; Carlos Cuenca; Diana Leung; Shunichi Homma; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Veli K Topkara; Koji Takeda; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; H Lee Sweeney; P Christian Schulze; Isaac George
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.