Literature DB >> 18177028

Predicting key example compounds in competitors' patent applications using structural information alone.

Kazunari Hattori1, Hiroaki Wakabayashi, Kenta Tamaki.   

Abstract

In drug discovery programs, predicting key example compounds in competitors' patent applications is important work for scientists working in the same or in related research areas. In general, medicinal chemists are responsible for this work, and they attempt to guess the identity of key compounds based on information provided in patent applications, such as biological data, scale of reaction, and/or optimization of the salt form for a particular compound. However, this is sometimes made difficult by the lack of such information. This paper describes a method for predicting key compounds in competitors' patent applications by using only structural information of example compounds. Based on the assumption that medicinal chemists usually carry out extensive structure--activity relationship (SAR) studies around key compounds, the method identifies compounds located at the centers of densely populated regions in the patent examples' chemical space, as represented by Extended Connectivity Fingerprints (ECFPs). For the validation of the method, a total of 30 patents containing structures of launched drugs were selected to test whether or not the method is able to predict key compounds (the launched drugs). In 17 out of the 30 patents (57%), the method was able to successfully predict the key compounds. The result indicates that our method could provide an alternative approach to predicting key compounds in cases where the conventional medicinal chemist's approach does not work well. This method could also be used as a complement to the traditional medicinal chemist's approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177028     DOI: 10.1021/ci7002686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

1.  Chemical property prediction under experimental biases.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Hisashi Kashima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; Michael A Walters
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  SCRIPDB: a portal for easy access to syntheses, chemicals and reactions in patents.

Authors:  Abraham Heifets; Igor Jurisica
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Managing expectations: assessment of chemistry databases generated by automated extraction of chemical structures from patents.

Authors:  Stefan Senger; Luca Bartek; George Papadatos; Anna Gaulton
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Automatic identification of relevant chemical compounds from patents.

Authors:  Saber A Akhondi; Hinnerk Rey; Markus Schwörer; Michael Maier; John Toomey; Heike Nau; Gabriele Ilchmann; Mark Sheehan; Matthias Irmer; Claudia Bobach; Marius Doornenbal; Michelle Gregory; Jan A Kors
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  IntelliPatent: a web-based intelligent system for fast chemical patent claim drafting.

Authors:  Pei-Hua Wang; Yufeng Jane Tseng
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  SureChEMBL: a large-scale, chemically annotated patent document database.

Authors:  George Papadatos; Mark Davies; Nathan Dedman; Jon Chambers; Anna Gaulton; James Siddle; Richard Koks; Sean A Irvine; Joe Pettersson; Nicko Goncharoff; Anne Hersey; John P Overington
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.