Literature DB >> 18175329

Prediction of protein structure from ideal forms.

William R Taylor1, Gail J Bartlett, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Daniel Klose, Kuang Lin, Tom Sheldon, Inge Jonassen.   

Abstract

For many years it has been accepted that the sequence of a protein can specify its three-dimensional structure. However, there has been limited progress in explaining how the sequence dictates its fold and no attempt to do this computationally without the use of specific structural data has ever succeeded for any protein larger than 100 residues. We describe a method that can predict complex folds up to almost 200 residues using only basic principles that do not include any elements of sequence homology. The method does not simulate the folding chain but generates many thousands of models based on an idealized representation of structure. Each rough model is scored and the best are refined. On a set of five proteins, the correct fold score well and when tested on a set of larger proteins, the correct fold was ranked highest for some proteins more than 150 residues, with others being close topological variants. All other methods that approach this level of success rely on the use of templates or fragments of known structures. Our method is unique in using a database of ideal models based on general packing rules that, in spirit, is closer to an ab initio approach. 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18175329     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  15 in total

1.  Protein topology from predicted residue contacts.

Authors:  William R Taylor; David T Jones; Michael I Sadowski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds.

Authors:  S M Hollup; E Fuglebakk; W R Taylor; N Reuter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations.

Authors:  Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Toward optimal fragment generations for ab initio protein structure assembly.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-10-16

5.  Systematic solution to homo-oligomeric structures determined by NMR.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Martin; Pei Zhou; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-02-05

6.  Helix-sheet packing in proteins.

Authors:  Chengcheng Hu; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-15

7.  PackHelix: a tool for helix-sheet packing during protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Chengcheng Hu; Patrice Koehl; Nelson Max
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-23

8.  Prediction of protein domain boundaries from inverse covariances.

Authors:  Michael I Sadowski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-10-16

9.  Mapping the distribution of packing topologies within protein interiors shows predominant preference for specific packing motifs.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design.

Authors:  James T MacDonald; Katarzyna Maksimiak; Michael I Sadowski; William R Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.