Literature DB >> 18175022

Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.

Steven J Page1, Jon C Volkwein, Robert P Vinson, Gerald J Joy, Steven E Mischler, Donald P Tuchman, Linda J McWilliams.   

Abstract

The United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, through an informal partnership with industry, labor, and the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration, has developed and tested a new instrument known as the Personal Dust Monitor (PDM). The new dust monitor is an integral part of the cap lamp that coal miners normally carry to work and provides continuous information about the concentration of respirable coal mine dust within the breathing zone of that individual. Previous laboratory testing demonstrated that there is a 95% confidence that greater than 95% of individual PDM measurements fall within +/-25% of reference measurements. The work presented in this paper focuses on the relationship between the PDM and respirable dust concentrations currently measured by a coal mine dust personal sampler unit utilizing a 10 mm Dorr-Oliver nylon cyclone. The United Kingdom Mining Research Establishment instrument, used as the basis for coal mine respirable dust standards, had been designed specifically to match the United Kingdom British Medical Research Council (BMRC) criterion. The personal sampler is used with a 1.38 multiplier to convert readings to the BMRC criterion. A stratified random sampling design incorporating a proportionate allocation strategy was used to select a sample of mechanized mining units representative of all US underground coal mines. A sample of 180 mechanized mining units was chosen, representing approximately 20% of the mechanized mining units in production at the time the sample was selected. A total of 129 valid PDM/personal sampler dust sample sets were obtained. A weighted linear regression analysis of this data base shows that, in comparison with the personal sampler, the PDM requires a mass equivalency conversion multiplier of 1.05 [95% C.I.=(1.03, 1.08)] when the small intercept term is removed from the analysis. Removal of the intercept term results in a personal sampler-equivalent concentration increase of 2.9% at a PDM measurement of 2.0 mg m(-3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18175022     DOI: 10.1039/b714381h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  9 in total

1.  Testing a revised inlet for the personal dust monitor.

Authors:  Steven E Mischler; Donald P Tuchman; Emanuele G Cauda; Jay F Colinet; Elaine N Rubinstein
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Evaluation of Diffuse Reflection Infrared Spectrometry for End-of-Shift Measurement of α-quartz in Coal Dust Samples.

Authors:  Arthur L Miller; Nathaniel C Murphy; Sean J Bayman; Zachary P Briggs; Andrew D Kilpatrick; Courtney A Quinn; Mackenzie R Wadas; Emanuele G Cauda; Peter R Griffiths
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Respirable dust measured downwind during rock dust application.

Authors:  M L Harris; J Organiscak; S Klima; I E Perera
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2017-05

4.  Evaluation of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for measurement of silica on filter samples of coal dust.

Authors:  Christopher B Stipe; Arthur L Miller; Jonathan Brown; Edward Guevara; Emanuele Cauda
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Evaluating portable infrared spectrometers for measuring the silica content of coal dust.

Authors:  Arthur L Miller; Pamela L Drake; Nathaniel C Murphy; James D Noll; Jon C Volkwein
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Portable instruments for measuring tailpipe diesel particulate in underground mines.

Authors:  J Noll; J Volkwein; S Janisko; L Patts
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2013-10

7.  Electromagnetic interference from personal dust monitors and other electronic devices with proximity detection systems.

Authors:  J Noll; R J Matetic; J Li; C Zhou; J DuCarme; M Reyes; J Srednicki
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2018-05

Review 8.  Respiratory diseases caused by coal mine dust.

Authors:  A Scott Laney; David N Weissman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.162

9.  Silica Measurement with High Flow Rate Respirable Size Selective Samplers: A Field Study.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Martin Harper; Michael Kashon; Larry A Lee; Catherine B Healy; Marie A Coggins; Pam Susi; Andrew O'Brien
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-11-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.