Literature DB >> 18174077

Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.

Lorenzo Franchi1, Tiziano Baccetti, Matteo Camporesi, Ersilia Barbato.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frictional forces generated by 4 types of passive stainless steel self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and by nonconventional elastomeric ligatures (NCEL) and conventional elastomeric ligatures (CEL) during sliding mechanics.
METHODS: An experimental model consisting of 5 aligned stainless steel 0.022-in brackets was used to assess frictional forces produced by the SLBs, NCEL, and CEL with a 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel wire.
RESULTS: Significantly smaller static and kinetic forces were generated by the SLBs and NCEL (<2 g) compared with the CEL (>500 g). No significant differences were found within the different types of SLBs, or between these and the NCEL.
CONCLUSIONS: SLBs and NCEL are valid alternatives for low friction during sliding mechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174077     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  19 in total

1.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

4.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar; Shamsher Singh; Rani Hamsa P R; Sameer Ahmed; Apoorva Bhatnagar; Manreet Sidhu; Pramod Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

6.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Raquel Morais Castro; Perrin Smith Neto; Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta; Matheus Melo Pithon; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Active and passive self-ligation: a myth? Part 1: torque control.

Authors:  Lorenz Martin Brauchli; Markus Steineck; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Debris, roughness and friction of stainless steel archwires following clinical use.

Authors:  Isabella Silva Vieira Marques; Adriana M Araújo; Júlio A Gurgel; David Normando
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.

Authors:  A Alper Oz; Nursel Arici; Selim Arici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.