Literature DB >> 18173892

Debate: a teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking.

Michele Darby1.   

Abstract

The literature highlights key benefits from debate as a teaching-learning strategy for developing critical thinking and analytical skills while fostering teamwork and communication. Authors report that this method of teaching-learning has been implemented successfully in nursing and occupational therapy programs and would benefit other academic programs in the health sciences, particularly in courses that cover controversial issues. Although there are disadvantages to using the debate as a teaching-learning strategy, the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. In conclusion, debating is an effective pedagogical strategy because of the level of responsibility for learning and active involvement required by all student debaters. Moreover, it provides an experience by which students can develop competencies in researching current issues, preparing logical arguments, actively listening to various perspectives, differentiating between subjective and evidence-based information, asking cogent questions, integrating relevant information, and formulating their own opinions based on evidence. After the debate is over, students also report that the experience is FUN!

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18173892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Hyg        ISSN: 1043-254X


  8 in total

1.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Focused Debate on the Development of Ethical Reasoning Skills in Pharmacy Technician Students.

Authors:  Seána Hogan; Julie Dunne
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Use of a policy debate to teach residents about health care reform.

Authors:  Vu Q C Nguyen; Mark A Hirsch
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

3.  Using debate to teach pharmacy students about ethical issues.

Authors:  Lezley-Anne Hanna; Johanne Barry; Ryan Donnelly; Fiona Hughes; David Jones; Garry Laverty; Carole Parsons; Cristin Ryan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Use of Debate as a Pedagogical Tool in Psychiatry Residency Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Qian Hui Chew; Xian Ying Seet; Kang Sim
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-08-10

5.  Not Another Boring Resident Didactic Conference.

Authors:  Alisa Wray; Margaret Wolff; Megan Boysen-Osborn; Warren Wiechmann; Sara Paradise; Elizabeth Runcie; Gabe Sudario; Shannon Toohey
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-07-09

6.  Effect of Interprofessional Clinical Debates on Attitudes of Interprofessional Teams.

Authors:  Taylor D Steuber; Miranda R Andrus; Bradley M Wright; Nancy Blevins; Haley M Phillippe
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2021-04-07

7.  To debate or not to debate? Examining the contribution of debating when studying medical ethics in small groups.

Authors:  Nehora Amar-Gavrilman; Miriam Ethel Bentwich
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Competitive Debate: A Successful Inter-team Gamification Experience in the Human Resources Subject.

Authors:  Guillermo A Sánchez Prieto; María José Martín Rodrigo; Antonio Rua Vieites
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.