Literature DB >> 18172740

Prostate-specific antigen screening and mortality from prostate cancer.

Stephen W Marcella1, George G Rhoads, Jeffrey L Carson, Frances Merlino, Homer Wilcox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no available evidence from randomized trials that early detection of prostate cancer improves health outcomes, but the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is commonly used to screen men for prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to see if screening with PSA decreases mortality from prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a case-control study using one-to-one matching on race, age, and time of availability of exposure to PSA screening. Decedents, 380, from New Jersey Vital Statistics 1997 to 2000 inclusive, 55-79 years of age at diagnosis were matched to living controls without metastatic prostate cancer. Medical records were obtained from all providers, and we abstracted information about PSA tests from 1989 to the time of diagnosis in each index case. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements consist of a comparison of screening (yes, no) between cases and controls. Measure of association was the odds ratio.
RESULTS: Eligible cases were diagnosed each year from 1989 to 1999 with the median year being 1993. PSA screening was evident in 23.2-29.2% of cases and 21.8-26.1% of controls depending on the screening criteria. The unadjusted, matched odds ratio for dying of prostate cancer if ever screened was 1.09 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.60) for the most restrictive criteria and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.66) for the least restrictive. Adjustment for comorbidity and education level made no significant differences in these values. There were no significant interactions by age or race.
CONCLUSIONS: PSA screening using an ever/never tabulation for tests from 1989 until 2000 did not protect New Jersey men from prostate cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172740      PMCID: PMC2359466          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0479-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Hans Garmo; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Bo Johan Norlén; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer?

Authors:  Harold C Sox; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Empirical comparison of the results of randomized controlled trials and case-control studies in evaluating the effectiveness of screening mammography.

Authors:  K Demissie; O F Mills; G G Rhoads
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Screening with prostate specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case-control study.

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Vivek Goel; Peter S Bunting; Jan Neuman; Eric C Sayre; Padraig Warde; Peter Levers; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status.

Authors:  J K Gohagan; P C Prorok; R B Hayes; B S Kramer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

6.  The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  John Concato; Carolyn K Wells; Ralph I Horwitz; David Penson; Graeme Fincke; Dan R Berlowitz; Gregory Froehlich; Dawna Blake; Martyn A Vickers; Gerald A Gehr; Nabil H Raheb; Gail Sullivan; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

Review 7.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section rotterdam.

Authors:  Ingrid W van der Cruijsen-Koeter; André N Vis; Monique J Roobol; Mark F Wildhagen; Harry J de Koning; Theo H van der Kwast; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen; Antonio Berenguer Sanchez; Fernando Calais da Silva; Stefano Ciatto; Louis Denis; John K Gohagan; Matti Hakama; Jonas Hugosson; Ries Kranse; Vera Nelen; Philip C Prorok; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; Judith Fine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Statin use and fatal prostate cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Stephen W Marcella; Alice David; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Jeffery Carson; George G Rhoads
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  What explains the differences between centres in the European screening trial? A simulation study.

Authors:  Jaakko Nevalainen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Teuvo L Tammela; Monique Roobol; Sigrid Carlsson; Kirsi Talala; Fritz H Schröder; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.