Literature DB >> 18172671

Apparent evaporative resistance at critical conditions for five clothing ensembles.

Victor Caravello1, Elizabeth A McCullough, Candi D Ashley, Thomas E Bernard.   

Abstract

A limiting factor for clothing ensembles inherent during heat stress exposures is the evaporative resistance, which can be used to compare candidate ensembles and in rational models of heat exchange. In this study, the apparent total evaporative resistance of five clothing ensembles (cotton work clothes, cotton coveralls, and coveralls made of Tyvek 1424 and 1427, NexGen and Tychem QC was estimated empirically from wear trials using a progressive heat stress protocol and from clothing insulation adjustments based on ISO 9920 (2007) and wetness. The metabolic rate was moderate at 165 W m(-2) and relative humidity was held at 50%. Twenty-nine heat-acclimated participants (20 men and 9 women) completed trials for all clothing ensembles. A general linear mixed effects model (ensemble and participants as a random effect) was used to analyze the data. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) among ensembles were observed for apparent total evaporative resistance. As expected, Tychem QC had the highest apparent total evaporative resistance at 0.033 kPa m(2) W(-1). NexGen was next at 0.017 kPa m(2) W(-1). These were followed by Tyvek 1424 at 0.015 kPa m(2) W(-1), and Tyvek 1427, Cotton Coveralls and Work Clothes all at 0.013 kPa m(2) W(-1). This wear test method improves on past methods using the progressive protocol to determine evaporative resistance by including the effects of movement, air motion and wetness on the estimate of clothing insulation. The pattern of evaporative resistance is the same as that for critical WBGTs and a linear relationship between apparent total evaporative resistance and WBGT clothing adjustment factor is suggested. With the large sample size, a good estimate of sample variance associated with progressive method can be made, where the standard error is 0.0044 kPa m(2) W(-1) with a 95% confidence interval of 0.0040-0.0050 kPa m(2) W(-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172671     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0655-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  12 in total

Review 1.  Clothing evaporative heat resistance--proposal for improved representation in standards and models.

Authors:  G Havenith; I Holmér; E A den Hartog; K C Parsons
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1999-07

2.  Clothing convective heat exchange--proposal for improved prediction in standards and models.

Authors:  I Holmér; H Nilsson; G Havenith; K Parsons
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1999-07

Review 3.  Heat balance when wearing protective clothing.

Authors:  G Havenith
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1999-07

4.  Continuing the search for WBGT clothing adjustment factors.

Authors:  D J O'Connor; T E Bernard
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  1999-02

5.  Non-evaporative effects of a wet mid layer on heat transfer through protective clothing.

Authors:  Peter Bröde; George Havenith; Xiaoxin Wang; Victor Candas; Emiel A den Hartog; Barbara Griefahn; Ingvar Holmér; Kalev Kuklane; Harriet Meinander; Wolfgang Nocker; Mark Richards
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The actual insulation of multilayer clothing.

Authors:  W A Lotens
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Evaporative coefficients for prediction of safe limits in prolonged exposures to work under hot conditions.

Authors:  H S Belding; E Kamon
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1973-05

8.  Simultaneous derivation of clothing-specific heat exchange coefficients.

Authors:  W L Kenney; D J Mikita; G Havenith; S M Puhl; P Crosby
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  WBGT clothing adjustments for four clothing ensembles under three relative humidity levels.

Authors:  Thomas E Bernard; Christina L Luecke; Skai W Schwartz; K Scott Kirkland; Candi D Ashley
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  WBGT clothing adjustment factors for four clothing ensembles and the effects of metabolic demands.

Authors:  Thomas E Bernard; Victor Caravello; Skai W Schwartz; Candi D Ashley
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.155

View more
  6 in total

1.  Psychrometric limits and critical evaporative coefficients for exercising older women.

Authors:  W Larry Kenney
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Measurements of clothing insulation with a thermal manikin operating under the thermal comfort regulation mode: comparative analysis of the calculation methods.

Authors:  A Virgílio M Oliveira; Adélio R Gaspar; Divo A Quintela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of temperature difference between manikin and wet fabric skin surfaces on clothing evaporative resistance: how much error is there?

Authors:  Faming Wang; Kalev Kuklane; Chuansi Gao; Ingvar Holmér
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Prediction of WBGT-based clothing adjustment values from evaporative resistance.

Authors:  Thomas E Bernard; Candi D Ashley; Ximena P Garzon; Jung-Hyun Kim; Aitor Coca
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Heat stress evaluation of two-layer chemical demilitarization ensembles with a full face negative pressure respirator.

Authors:  Oclla Michele Fletcher; Ryan Guerrina; Candi D Ashley; Thomas E Bernard
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 6.  Measurements of clothing evaporative resistance using a sweating thermal manikin: an overview.

Authors:  Faming Wang
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.