Literature DB >> 10481633

Clothing evaporative heat resistance--proposal for improved representation in standards and models.

G Havenith1, I Holmér, E A den Hartog, K C Parsons.   

Abstract

Clothing heat and vapour resistance are important inputs for standards and models dealing with thermal comfort, heat- and cold-stress. A vast database of static clothing heat resistance values is available, and this was recently expanded with correction equations to account for effects of movement and wind on the static value of heat resistance in order to obtain the dynamic heat resistance of clothing ensembles. For clothing vapour resistance, few data were available so far. Indices for vapour permeability (im) and reduction factors for vapour transfer (Fpcl) of clothing were used instead, using a relation between heat and vapour resistance to derive the clothing vapour resistance from the value for clothing heat resistance. This paper reviews the two commonly used approaches (im and Fpcl), as well as five alternative approaches to the problem. The different approaches were evaluated for their accuracy and their usability. The present paper shows that the currently used relations are not adequate when the wearer of the clothing starts moving, or is exposed to wind. Alternative approaches are shown to improve the determination of dynamic clothing vapour resistance, though some are thought to be too complex. An empirical description of the relation between the clothing permeability index (im) and the changes in clothing heat resistance due to wind and movement was selected as the most promising method for deriving clothing vapour resistance. For this method the user needs to know the static heat resistance, the static im value of the clothing and the wind- and movement-speed of the wearer. This method results in a predicted maximal decrease in clothing vapour resistance by 78%, when clothing heat resistance is reduced by 50%, which is consistent with theoretical expectations and available data.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10481633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  13 in total

1.  Part B: Revisions to the COMFA outdoor thermal comfort model for application to subjects performing physical activity.

Authors:  Natasha A Kenny; Jon S Warland; Robert D Brown; Terry G Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The UTCI-clothing model.

Authors:  George Havenith; Dusan Fiala; Krzysztof Błazejczyk; Mark Richards; Peter Bröde; Ingvar Holmér; Hannu Rintamaki; Yael Benshabat; Gerd Jendritzky
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 3.  Partitional calorimetry.

Authors:  Matthew N Cramer; Ollie Jay
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-11-29

Review 4.  Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity.

Authors:  Josh Foster; Simon G Hodder; Alex B Lloyd; George Havenith
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Apparent evaporative resistance at critical conditions for five clothing ensembles.

Authors:  Victor Caravello; Elizabeth A McCullough; Candi D Ashley; Thomas E Bernard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Prediction of air temperature for thermal comfort of people in outdoor environments.

Authors:  Jianhua Huang
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Estimating risks of heat strain by age and sex: a population-level simulation model.

Authors:  Kathryn Glass; Peter W Tait; Elizabeth G Hanna; Keith Dear
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prediction of WBGT-based clothing adjustment values from evaporative resistance.

Authors:  Thomas E Bernard; Candi D Ashley; Ximena P Garzon; Jung-Hyun Kim; Aitor Coca
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 9.  Occupational heat stress assessment and protective strategies in the context of climate change.

Authors:  Chuansi Gao; Kalev Kuklane; Per-Olof Östergren; Tord Kjellstrom
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Burn Injury Does Not Exacerbate Heat Strain during Exercise while Wearing Body Armor.

Authors:  Mads Fischer; Matthew N Cramer; M U Huang; Luke N Belval; Joseph C Watso; Frank A Cimino; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.