Literature DB >> 1817073

Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study.

K Hansen1, H Pancherz, U Hägg.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the dentofacial complex with special reference to the growth period in which the patients were treated. The sample consisted of 40 male subjects with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated successfully with the Herbst appliance for an average period of 7 months. The patients were reinvestigated at the end of the growth period, on average 6.6 years (SD = 1.0 years) after therapy. Nineteen patients were treated before the maximum of pubertal growth (prepeak), 15 at the maximum (peak) and 6 after the pubertal growth maximum (post-peak). Sagittal skeletal and dental changes occurring during and after Herbst treatment were evaluated on lateral radiographs in centric occlusion. At the time of follow-up examination no group differences were seen in sagittal dental arch relationships. During the follow-up period after Herbst treatment maxillary and mandibular growth development were favourable and comparable in all three groups: mandibular growth exceeding maxillary growth by an average of 4.3 mm (SD = 2.4 mm). For natural reasons, however, the amount of jaw growth during the follow-up period was larger in the subjects treated before the maximum of pubertal growth than in the subjects treated at the later stages. The conclusion of this study was that the growth period in which Herbst treatment was performed did not seem to have any conclusive effect on the long-term results. However, in order to favour occlusal stability after treatment and to reduce the time of post-treatment retention, Herbst therapy in the permanent dentition at or just after peak height velocity of growth is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1817073     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/13.6.471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  [The dental and skeletal changes in early Class II treatment with a Klammt open activator].

Authors:  L Eckardt; G Kanitz; W Harzer
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-11

2.  Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period.

Authors:  H Eberhard; U Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Kyle L Taylor; Karine Evangelista; Luciana Muniz; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; José Valladares-Neto; James McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi; Hera Kim-Berman; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Arjun Atresh; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Luciana Muniz; Tung Nguyen; Brent Larson; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Pubertal status of children and adolescents during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; K-F Krey; C Hirsch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Chiara Pavoni; Kurt Faltin; James A McNamara; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Evaluation of temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscle, and brain cortex activity in patients treated by removable functional appliances: a prospective fMRI study.

Authors:  Orhan Ozdiler; Kaan Orhan; Emre Cesur; Ayşegül Köklü; Oktay Algın
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Dalia Latkauskiene; James A McNamara
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.