Literature DB >> 18164172

Prognostic relevance of proliferative activity evaluated by Mib-1 immunostaining in node negative breast cancer.

A Neri1, D Marrelli, C Pedrazzani, S Caruso, A De Stefano, F Mariani, T Megha, G De Marco, G Corso, E Pinto, F Roviello.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this prospective observational study was to analyze the role of Mib-1 immunostaining as a proliferation index in breast cancer. Correlations between Mib-1 expression and clinico-pathological characteristics as well as its prognostic value have been studied in a series of 432 node negative breast cancers.
METHODS: Mib-1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Tumor sections from highly cellular invasive areas of cancer were stained by monoclonal antibody Mib-1 (Dako) and cells whose nuclei stained positive were counted in 10 randomly chosen HPFs and expressed as percentages of all epithelial cells. A minimum of 400 cells were counted. Correlation between Mib-1 staining and clinico-pathological factors was investigated by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. The prognostic impact on actuarial disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by univariate analysis using the log-rank test and by multivariate analysis using Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Tumors were considered as positive for Mib-1 expression when more than 15% of cells counted were stained. Mib-1 positivity was found in 190/432 cases and resulted in being significantly related to tumor grade, tumor size and absence of estrogen receptors at multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 66 months, Mib-1 positivity resulted in being the only independent predictor of OS (RR 2.92), and an independent predictor of DFS (RR 2.01) together with absence of estrogen receptors (RR 2.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Mib-1 index of proliferative activity correlates well to other established prognostic factors of breast cancer. Mib-1 index may improve the tailoring of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer, and our experience adds evidence to its effectiveness as prognostic factor. Efforts to reach uniformity in the methodology and in the scoring system should be done to warrant a standardized procedure and make Mib-1 determination definitively reliable in the current clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18164172     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of proliferation markers expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Natalija Dedić Plavetić; Jasminka Jakić-Razumović; Ana Kulić; Damir Vrbanec
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Hepatic metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  Arianna Rubino; Roberto Doci; Jean Claude Foteuh; Emanuela Morenghi; Susanna Fissi; Casimiro Giorgetta; Islam Abumalouh; Luca Di Tommaso; Leandro Gennari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-12

3.  Prognostic value of ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls.

Authors:  Natalija Dedić Plavetić; Jasminka Jakić-Razumović; Ana Kulić; Maja Sirotković-Skerlev; Marina Barić; Damir Vrbanec
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  [Assessment of proliferation: core biopsy or resection specimen? Discrepancies in breast cancer with low and high proliferation].

Authors:  E C Obermann; S Eppenberger-Castori; C Tapia
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Histological grading of breast cancer on needle core biopsy: the role of immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation.

Authors:  T'ng Chang Kwok; Emad A Rakha; Andrew H S Lee; Matthew Grainge; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Desmond G Powe
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Differences in Clinical Outcomes between Luminal A and B Type Breast Cancers according to the St. Gallen Consensus 2013.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Ahn; Soo Jin Jung; Tae Hyun Kim; Min Kyung Oh; Hye-Kyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Does liver resection provide long-term survival benefits for breast cancer patients with liver metastasis? A single hospital experience.

Authors:  Jee Ye Kim; Joon Seong Park; Seung Ah Lee; Jae Keun Kim; Joon Jeong; Dong Sup Yoon; Hy-De Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  "Clinical significance of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers and choice of surgical treatment: a retrospective study on a series of 1158 cases".

Authors:  Alessandro Neri; Daniele Marrelli; Tiziana Megha; Francesca Bettarini; Damiana Tacchini; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Roviello
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Analysis of the potent prognostic factors in luminal-type breast cancer.

Authors:  Han-Sung Kim; Inseok Park; Hyun Jin Cho; Geumhee Gwak; Keunho Yang; Byung Noe Bae; Ki Whan Kim; Sehwan Han; Hong-Joo Kim; Young-Duck Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Feng-yan Li; San-gang Wu; Juan Zhou; Jia-yuan Sun; Qin Lin; Huan-xin Lin; Xun-xing Guan; Zhen-yu He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.