Literature DB >> 1816387

Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man.

Y Ugawa1, B L Day, J C Rothwell, P D Thompson, P A Merton, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

1. We have stimulated over the cerebellum of intact human subjects by applying single electrical stimuli through electrodes placed on the back of the head, approximately at the level of the inion. The intensity of stimulation used was below that required to produce direct EMG responses in pre-activated muscles of the hand. 2. In ten subjects the effect of the stimulus over the cerebellum was to reduce the size of the EMG response in first dorsal interosseous muscle evoked by a magnetic stimulus to the cerebral cortex. In all subjects the onset of the period of suppression occurred when the test magnetic cortical shock followed the conditioning cerebellar shock by 5 ms. The duration of the suppression lasted from 3 to 7 ms. 3. The amount of suppression was related to the intensity of stimulation over the cerebellum. At 15% below the threshold for direct motor activation there was no effect; increasing suppression was evident at 10, 5 and 0% below motor threshold. 4. With a conditioning-test interval of 5-6 ms the suppression was the same whether the target muscle was relaxed or active. With longer conditioning-test intervals (12 and 15 ms) the amount of suppression was greater in active than relaxed muscles. 5. The short-latency suppression was greatest when the stimulating anode was ipsilateral to the target muscle and contralateral to the stimulated sensorimotor cortex. The later period of suppression was insensitive to the polarity of stimulation. When the stimulating electrodes were moved 2 cm caudally or cranially the short latency suppression disappeared whereas the longer latency suppression was still observed with the electrodes in the lower position. 6. Different results were obtained when the test EMG response was produced by an electrical (rather than magnetic) stimulus over the sensorimotor cortex. The short latency effect was no longer visible whereas the longer latency effect was the same as when testing with a magnetic cortical stimulus. 7. We suggest that a single electrical stimulus across the base of the skull (particularly with the anode over one cerebellar hemisphere) produces a short latency (5-6 ms) disfacilitation of the contralateral motor cortex through activation of cerebellar structures. A later (12 and 15 ms), less specific suppression which is present when testing in active muscles is thought to be mediated by a different mechanism and probably produces its effect at the level of the spinal cord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1816387      PMCID: PMC1180185          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  13 in total

1.  Effects on Purkinje cells of surface stimulation of the cerebellum.

Authors:  R GRANIT; C G PHILLIPS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-01-23       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  S A Edgley; J A Eyre; R N Lemon; S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  A K Datta; L M Harrison; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Percutaneous electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the level of the pyramidal decussation in humans.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man.

Authors:  B L Day; H Riescher; A Struppler; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

Authors:  B L Day; D Dressler; A Maertens de Noordhout; C D Marsden; K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Cerebrocerebellar communication systems.

Authors:  G I Allen; N Tsukahara
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Inhibitory control of intracerebellar nuclei by the purkinje cell axons.

Authors:  M Ito; M Yoshida; K Obata; N Kawai; M Udo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject.

Authors:  P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The uptake of radiolabelled precursors of mucus glycoconjugates by secretory tissues in the feline trachea.

Authors:  J R Davies; C M Corbishley; P S Richardson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  59 in total

1.  Long lasting effects of rTMS and associated peripheral sensory input on MEPs, SEPs and transcortical reflex excitability in humans.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tsuji; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; N T Petersen; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  A Ferbert; A Priori; J C Rothwell; B L Day; J G Colebatch; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Cerebellar stimulation in ataxia.

Authors:  Stefan Jun Groiss; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kenichi Horino; Atsuko Yagura; Akiyoshi Matsugi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Facilitatory effect on the motor cortex by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in humans.

Authors:  Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ritsuko Hanajima; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Yasuo Terao; Haruo Uesugi; Yasushi Shiio; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Ichiro Kanazawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Treatment and physiology in Parkinson's disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Aparna Wagle Shukla; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humans.

Authors:  L Bertolasi; A Priori; M Tinazzi; V Bertasi; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.