Literature DB >> 18162757

Adapting industry-style business model to academia in a system of Performance-based Incentive Compensation.

E Albert Reece1, Olan Nugent, Richard P Wheeler, Charles W Smith, Aubrey J Hough, Charles Winter.   

Abstract

Performance-Based Incentive Compensation (PBIC) plans currently prevail throughout industry and have repeatedly demonstrated effectiveness as powerful motivational tools for attracting and retaining top talent, enhancing key indicators, increasing employee productivity, and, ultimately, enhancing mission-based parameters. The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) College of Medicine introduced its PBIC plan to further the transition of the college to a high-performing academic and clinical enterprise. A forward-thinking compensation plan was progressively implemented during a three-year period. After the introduction of an aggressive five-year vision plan in 2002, the college introduced a PBIC plan designed to ensure the retention and recruitment of high-quality faculty through the use of uncapped salaries that reflect each faculty member's clinical, research, and education duties. The PBIC plan was introduced with broad, schoolwide principles adaptable to each department and purposely flexible to allow for tailor-made algorithms to fit the specific approaches required by individual departments. As of July 2006, the college had begun to reap a variety of short-term benefits from Phase I of its PBIC program, including increases in revenue and faculty salaries, and increased faculty morale and satisfaction.Successful implementation of a PBIC plan depends on a host of factors, including the development of a process for evaluating performance that is considered fair and reliable to the entire faculty. The college has become more efficient and effective by adopting such a program, which has helped it to increase overall productivity. The PBIC program continues to challenge our faculty members to attain their highest potential while rewarding them accordingly.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18162757     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31815c6508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Validity and Feasibility of the Minicard Direct Observation Tool in 1 Training Program.

Authors:  Anthony A Donato; Yoon Soo Park; David L George; Alan Schwartz; Rachel Yudkowsky
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Capturing Psychologists' Work in Academic Health Settings: The Role of the Educational Value Unit (EVU).

Authors:  Eugene J D'Angelo; Katie Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2016-03

3.  Incorporating evidence-based medicine into resident education: a CORD survey of faculty and resident expectations.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Bryan G Kane; Merle Carter; Raymond Lucas; Lee G Wilbur; Charles S Graffeo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Using Organizational Philosophy to Create a Self-Sustaining Compensation Plan Without Harming Academic Missions.

Authors:  Robert Leverence; Richard Nuttall; Rachel Palmer; Mark Segal; Alicia Wood; Fay Yancey; Jonathon Shuster; Mark Brantly; Robert Hromas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The Evolution of Earned, Transparent, and Quantifiable Faculty Salary Compensation: The Johns Hopkins Pathology Experience.

Authors:  Kathleen H Burns; Michael J Borowitz; Karen C Carroll; Christopher D Gocke; Jody E Hooper; Timothy Amukele; Aaron A R Tobian; Allen Valentine; Rob Kahl; Vanessa Rodas-Eral; John K Boitnott; J Brooks Jackson; Fred Sanfilippo; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2018-06-11

6.  Impact of a financial incentive on the completion of educational metrics.

Authors:  Andrew Pugh; Tabitha Ford; Troy Madsen; Christine Carlson; Gerard Doyle; Robert Stephen; Susan Stroud; Megan Fix
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-12-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.