Literature DB >> 18161781

In vitro microTBS of one-bottle adhesive systems: sound versus artificially-created caries-affected dentin.

Maria Carolina G Erhardt1, José Augusto Rodrigues, Thiago Assunção Valentino, André Vicente Ritter, Luiz André Freire Pimenta.   

Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate a pH-cycling model for simulation of caries-affected dentin (CAD) surfaces, by comparing the bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems on sound and artificially-created CAD. Dentin substrates with different mineral contents and morphological patterns were created by submitting buccal bovine dentin to the following treatments: (1) immersion in artificial saliva during the experimental period (sound dentin, SD), or (2) induction to a CAD condition by means of a dynamic pH-cycling model (8 cycles, demineralization for 3 h followed by mineralization for 45 h). The bond strength of Excite or Prime and Bond NT adhesive systems was assessed using the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) test. Dentin microhardness was determined by cross-sectional Knoop evaluations. Resin-dentin morphology after the treatments was examined by scanning electron microscopy. SD produced significantly higher microTBS than CAD for both adhesives evaluated, without differences between materials. CAD exhibited lower microhardness than SD. Morphological analysis showed marked distinctions between SD and CAD bonded interfaces. Under the conditions of this study, differences in morphological pattern and dentin mineral content may help to explain resin-dentin bond strengths. The proposed pH-cycling model may be a suitable method to simulate CAD surfaces for bonding evaluations. 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18161781     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  7 in total

1.  Nanoleakage related to bond strength in RM-GIC and adhesive restorations.

Authors:  M Marquezan; J A Skupien; B L da Silveira; A Ciamponi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-02

2.  A biofilm cariogenic challenge model for dentin demineralization and dentin bonding analysis.

Authors:  Tamires T Maske; Cristina P Isolan; Françoise H van de Sande; Aline C Peixoto; André L Faria-E-Silva; Maximiliano S Cenci; Rafael R Moraes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of method of caries induction on aged resin-dentin bond of primary teeth.

Authors:  Tathiane Larissa Lenzi; Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Hérica Adad Ricci; Josimeri Hebling; Daniela Prócida Raggio
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives.

Authors:  Andressa Cargnelutti Follak; Leonardo Lamberti Miotti; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi; Rachel de Oliveira Rocha; Fabio Zovico Maxnuck Soares
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed.

Authors:  Gustavo Fabián Molina; Ricardo Juan Cabral; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness and Enamel Solubility of Treated Surface Enamel with Resin Infiltrant, Fluoride Varnish, and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Steffi N Dhillon; Anshula N Deshpande; Chirag Macwan; Kinjal S Patel; Yash S Shah; Aishwarya A Jain
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020

7.  Biomimetic Mineralizing Agents Recover the Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Demineralized Dentin.

Authors:  Luiz Filipe Barbosa-Martins; Jossaria Pereira de Sousa; Lívia Araújo Alves; Robert Philip Wynn Davies; Regina Maria Puppin-Rontanti
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.