Literature DB >> 18159839

Internet report cards on quality: what exists and the evidence on impact.

Robert Thomas Carlisle1.   

Abstract

Report cards based on publicly disclosed data abound. Consumers can use the internet to review grades on physicians, hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, and insurance plans. The reports differ in their combinations of mortality data, process measures, access scores, and satisfaction surveys. The internet sites also differ by access charge, data sources, and presentation of information. Public disclosure of quality data has had little impact on the behavior of consumers, larger purchasers of health care, and physicians. However, health care provider organizations have responded to the public reports of quality. Analysis of the impact of public report cards is lagging as web-available reports rapidly grow and pay for performance programs emerge.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18159839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  W V Med J        ISSN: 0043-3284


  3 in total

1.  Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  An international comparison of web-based reporting about health care quality: content analysis.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Ylva Ka van den Hengel; A Jeanne M van Loon; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Benchmarking facilities providing care: An international overview of initiatives.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Jonathan Watson; Mahasti Saghatchian
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.