Literature DB >> 18159042

Readability of consumer medication information for intranasal corticosteroid inhalers.

Steven E Roskos1, Lorraine S Wallace, Barry D Weiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The readability of consumer medication information (CMI) inserts accompanying intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) inhalers currently prescribed in the United States was studied.
METHODS: INCS inhalers were identified (n = 7) using Epocrates R(x) Pro and English- language CMI was obtained from each inhaler's manufacturer. The CMI was evaluated for reading grade level (using Fry's readability formula) and font size, dimensions (length and width), illustrations (diagrams and figures), and directions for use.
RESULTS: The mean +/- S.D. reading grade level of the CMI was 6.9 +/- 0.7 (range, 6-8). The mean +/- S.D. font size was 9.0 +/- 2.2 (range, 6-12). The mean +/- S.D. CMI page length and width were 31.3 +/- 22.5 cm and 14.0 +/- 12.9 cm, respectively. A device-overview figure was included in three of the seven educational samples. The mean size of illustrations was 7.9 cm(2) (range, 2.9-25.9 cm(2)), with a mean +/- S.D. of 7.6 +/- 3.2 (range, 3-11) figures per CMI insert. Directions followed a logical, step-by-step chronological sequence in every CMI insert.
CONCLUSION: Most CMI for INCS inhalers is written at a reading level slightly higher than recommended, printed in a font size smaller than recommended, and illustrated inadequately for successful patient education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18159042     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp070087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing subjects' comprehension of a set of medicine package inserts.

Authors:  Carla Pires; Marina Vigário; Afonso Cavaco
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-04-23

2.  Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.

Authors:  Saangyoung E Lee; William C Brown; Mark W Gelpi; Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 3.  Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carla Pires; Marina Vigário; Afonso Cavaco
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Analyzing readability of medicines information material in Slovenia.

Authors:  Karin Kasesnik; Mihael Kline
Journal:  South Med Rev       Date:  2011-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.