Literature DB >> 18158223

The zonal architecture of human articular cartilage described by T2 relaxation time in the presence of Gd-DTPA2-.

Jatta E Kurkijärvi1, Mikko J Nissi, Jarno Rieppo, Juha Töyräs, Ilkka Kiviranta, Miika T Nieminen, Jukka S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

The depth-wise variation of T(2) relaxation time is known to reflect the collagen network architecture in cartilage, while the delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) technique is sensitive to tissue proteoglycan (PG) concentration. As the cartilage PG content varies along the tissue depth, the depth-dependent accumulation of the contrast agent may affect the inherent T(2) of cartilage in a nonconstant manner. Therefore, T(2) and dGEMRIC are typically measured in separate MRI sessions. In the present in vitro MRI study at 9.4 T, depth-wise T(2) profiles and collagenous zone thicknesses as determined from T(2) maps in the absence and presence of Gd-DTPA(2-) (T(2) and T(2Gd), respectively) were compared in samples of intact human articular cartilage (n=65). These T(2) measures were further correlated with birefringence (BF) of polarized light microscopy (PLM) to quantify the ability of MRI to predict the properties of the collagen fibril network. The reproducibility of the T(2) measurement in the current setup was also studied. Typical tri-laminar collagen network architecture was observed both with and without Gd-DTPA(2-). The inverse of BF (1/BF) correlated significantly with both T(2) and T(2Gd) (r=0.91, slope=0.56 and r=0.90, slope=0.63), respectively. The statistically significant linear correlations between zone thicknesses as determined from T(2) and T(2Gd) were r=0.55 (slope=0.49), r=0.74 (slope=0.71) and r=0.95 (slope=0.94) for superficial, middle and deep tissue zones, respectively. Reproducibility of the T(2) measurement was worst for superficial cartilage. Consistent with PLM, T(2) and T(2Gd) measurements reveal highly similar depth-dependent information on collagen network in intact human cartilage. Thus, dGEMRIC and T(2) measurements in one MRI session are feasible for intact articular cartilage in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158223     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  10 in total

1.  Ultra-high field diffusion tensor imaging of articular cartilage correlated with histology and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  José G Raya; Andreas P Arnoldi; Daniel L Weber; Lucianna Filidoro; Olaf Dietrich; Silvia Adam-Neumair; Elisabeth Mützel; Gerd Melkus; Reinhard Putz; Maximilian F Reiser; Peter M Jakob; Christian Glaser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Comparison of different material models of articular cartilage in 3D computational modeling of the knee: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  Olesya Klets; Mika E Mononen; Petri Tanska; Miika T Nieminen; Rami K Korhonen; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Morphological imaging and T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage at 7 Tesla MRI under the influence of intravenous gadolinium.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik-Palm; Oliver Kraff; Christina Geis; Sören Johst; Juliane Goebel; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Kinematic biomechanical assessment of human articular cartilage transplants in the knee using 3-T MRI: an in vivo reproducibility study.

Authors:  Vladimir Juras; Goetz H Welsch; Steven Millington; Pavol Szomolanyi; Tallal C Mamisch; Katja Pinker; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Tissue engineering of articular cartilage with biomimetic zones.

Authors:  Travis J Klein; Jos Malda; Robert L Sah; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Non-invasive and in vivo assessment of osteoarthritic articular cartilage: a review on MRI investigations.

Authors:  Ahmad Fadzil Mohd Hani; Dileep Kumar; Aamir Saeed Malik; Raja Mohd Kamil Raja Ahmad; Ruslan Razak; Azman Kiflie
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  T2 values of femoral cartilage of the knee joint: comparison between pre-contrast and post-contrast images.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Yoon; Young Cheol Yoon; Bong-Keun Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Probing articular cartilage damage and disease by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Deva D Chan; Corey P Neu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The in vivo effects of unloading and compression on T1-Gd (dGEMRIC) relaxation times in healthy articular knee cartilage at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marius E Mayerhoefer; Goetz H Welsch; Tallal C Mamisch; Franz Kainberger; Michael Weber; Stefan Nemec; Klaus M Friedrich; Albert Dirisamer; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A New Method for Cartilage Evaluation in Femoroacetabular Impingement Using Quantitative T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Validation against Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Noam Ben-Eliezer; José G Raya; James S Babb; Thomas Youm; Daniel K Sodickson; Riccardo Lattanzi
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.