Literature DB >> 18158092

Effects of feedback on time production errors in aging participants.

Brian C Rakitin1, Chara Malapani.   

Abstract

In two experiments, healthy participants ages 60 years and older provided peak-interval time production data for two target intervals (6 and 17s) over 2 days (baseline and retest sessions). In Experiment 1, three groups of participants were provided with two types of feedback during the baseline session that assisted either decision criteria setting or memory updating. During the retest session, run after a 24-h delay, each group received either one of the two types of feedback, or no feedback at all. Experiment 2 varied three additional groups' feedback during the baseline session only. Results indicated that the duration-dependent timing errors previously associated with aging did not occur during the retest session with the decision-criteria feedback regimen, or during the baseline session even in the complete absence of feedback. Thus, testing following the delay and without decision-criteria feedback are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the expression the timing errors in aging. The efficacy of memory updating feedback could not be established. The discussion contrasts these results with the conditions that produce abnormal timing in Parkinson's disease patients in a similar procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158092     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  6 in total

1.  Variability in interval production is due to timing-dependent deficits in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Ashwini K Rao; Karen S Marder; Jasim Uddin; Brian C Rakitin
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 2.  Neurocognitive contributions to motor skill learning: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Jin Bo; Joaquin A Anguera
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

4.  Age-related declines in visuospatial working memory correlate with deficits in explicit motor sequence learning.

Authors:  J Bo; V Borza; R D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.

Authors:  Martine Turgeon; Cindy Lustig; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Analysis of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors Influencing Timing and Time Perception.

Authors:  Alex J Bartholomew; Warren H Meck; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.