Literature DB >> 18158030

Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only.

Onisuru T Okotie1, Kimberly A Roehl, Misop Han, Stacy Loeb, Sara N Gashti, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine clinical and pathologic features and postoperative survival outcomes of men with prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination (DRE) alone, elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level alone, or abnormalities in both.
METHODS: From 1989 to 2001, approximately 36,000 men participated in a prostate cancer screening study. We recommended biopsy for a PSA level greater than 4.0 ng/mL (until 1995) or greater than 2.5 ng/mL (after 1995) or DRE findings suspicious for cancer. The clinical and pathologic features were compared between patients with cancer detected by DRE alone and those with cancer detected by an elevated PSA level, regardless of DRE findings. We also evaluated progression-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: Overall 303 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer by DRE alone, 1426 because of PSA level alone, and 504 by abnormal results on both tests. Of the cancers detected by DRE alone, 60 (20%) were non-organ-confined and 56 (20%) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher. Prostate cancers detected because of abnormalities in both PSA level and DRE results were significantly more likely to have adverse pathologic features, as well as lower rates of progression-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival than those detected by either test alone (all P <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of prostate cancers detected by DRE at PSA levels less than 4 ng/mL have features associated with clinically aggressive tumors. The omission of DRE from screening protocols might compromise treatment outcomes because many of the cancers detected by DRE alone are potentially curable but may have worse outcomes by the time PSA also reaches a higher level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158030     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  William J Catalona
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.456

2.  Association of training level and outcome of software-based image fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Niklas Westhoff; Henning Haumann; Maximilian Christian Kriegmair; Jost von Hardenberg; Johannes Budjan; Stefan Porubsky; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Manuel Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Predictive value of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection is modified by obesity.

Authors:  D I Chu; C De Nunzio; L Gerber; J-A Thomas; E E Calloway; S Albisinni; C Senocak; M G McKeever; D M Moreira; A Tubaro; J W Moul; S J Freedland; L L Bañez
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Udo Paul; Leif Bäurle; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Peter C Albertsen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Prostate cancer: the need for biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Juliana Felgueiras; Joana Vieira Silva; Margarida Fardilha
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.