Bo Moon Shin1, Eun Young Kuak. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, Korea. bmshin@unitel.co.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is one of the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial diarrhea. Recently, we have frequently experienced culture positive, toxin A enzyme immunoassay negative strains. Therefore, we evaluated the strains with several PCR primer sets to characterize them. METHODS: A total of 351 stool specimens were examined for toxin A using enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and also cultured for C. difficile using cycloserine cefoxitine fructose agar incubated under anaerobic conditions. Spore stain and Vitek ANA identification card (BioMerieux, France) were used for identification of C. difficile. We amplified toxin A and toxin B genes in 81 isolates using primers NK1- NK2, NK3-NK2, NK9- NK11, and NK104-NK105. RESULTS: The concordance rate between ELFA and culture was 65.2% (229/351). PCR for the toxin A gene using NK1-NK2, NK3-NK2 and for the toxin B gene using NK104-NK105 showed almost the same results. However, toxin A gene PCR using NK9-NK11 showed that 45.7% (37/81) of the evaluated strains were toxin A (-)/ toxin B(+) variant strains; thus, the corrected sensitivity and specificity of the ELFA based on the PCR results for toxin A and B genes were 65.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low sensitivity of the ELFA results for toxin A was due to the toxin A(-)/toxin B(+) variants of C. difficile, suggesting that the prevalence of the variant strains could be higher in Korea than was expected.
BACKGROUND:Clostridium difficile is one of the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial diarrhea. Recently, we have frequently experienced culture positive, toxin A enzyme immunoassay negative strains. Therefore, we evaluated the strains with several PCR primer sets to characterize them. METHODS: A total of 351 stool specimens were examined for toxin A using enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassay (ELFA) and also cultured for C. difficile using cycloserinecefoxitine fructoseagar incubated under anaerobic conditions. Spore stain and Vitek ANA identification card (BioMerieux, France) were used for identification of C. difficile. We amplified toxin A and toxin B genes in 81 isolates using primers NK1- NK2, NK3-NK2, NK9- NK11, and NK104-NK105. RESULTS: The concordance rate between ELFA and culture was 65.2% (229/351). PCR for the toxin A gene using NK1-NK2, NK3-NK2 and for the toxin B gene using NK104-NK105 showed almost the same results. However, toxin A gene PCR using NK9-NK11 showed that 45.7% (37/81) of the evaluated strains were toxin A (-)/ toxin B(+) variant strains; thus, the corrected sensitivity and specificity of the ELFA based on the PCR results for toxin A and B genes were 65.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low sensitivity of the ELFA results for toxin A was due to the toxin A(-)/toxin B(+) variants of C. difficile, suggesting that the prevalence of the variant strains could be higher in Korea than was expected.