Literature DB >> 18156512

Debating disability.

T Shakespeare1.   

Abstract

This paper responds to the reviews by Edwards, Holm, Koch, Thomas and Vehmas of Disability Rights and Wrongs (2006). After summarising the recent history of disability studies as a discipline, it explores: the political nature of disability research, questions of ontology and definition, and the uses and abuses of the expressivist argument. Disability is an emerging field of enquiry and constructive debate is to be welcomed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18156512     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: engaging with the expressivist objection.

Authors:  Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Cleft lip and palate: Parental experiences of stigma, discrimination, and social/structural inequalities.

Authors:  Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo; Olutayo James; Azeez Butali
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.