Literature DB >> 18155288

Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.

Jan W V van Dijken1, Ulla Pallesen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term retention to dentin of seven adhesive systems.
METHODS: A total of 270 Class V restorations of four etch-and-rinse, one self-etch adhesive system and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement were placed in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional enamel involvement. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then every year during a 13-year follow-up. Dentin bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations.
RESULTS: During the 13 years, 215 restorations could be evaluated. The cumulative loss rate at 13 years was 53.0%, with significant different failures rates for the different systems varying between 35.6 and 86.8%. Four systems fulfilled the ADA 18-month full acceptance retention criteria. Two systems showed at 18 months and earlier high debonding rates. The annual failure rates for the etch-and-rinse systems were Optibond 3.1%, Permagen 13.0%, Scotchbond MP 4.8%, Syntac classic 2.8%; for the self-etch system P&S 4.4%; and the resin-modified glass ionomer cement Vitremer 2.7%.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that all systems showed a continuous degradation of the bond with a wide variation, which was independent of the adhesion strategy. Three bonding systems showed a cumulative failure rate after 13 years between 36 and 41% with the best retention for the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a four-step etch-and-rinse system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18155288     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  17 in total

1.  A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; Jan De Munck; Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Andre Poitevin; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  In vitro evaluation of microleakage in primary teeth restored with three adhesive materials: ACTIVA™, composite resin, and resin-modified glass ionomer.

Authors:  A I Amaireh; S H Al-Jundi; H A Alshraideh
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 4.  Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions--a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos; Nilgun Ari; Shawn Steele; John Costella; David Banting
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Fatigue resistance of dentin bonds prepared with two- vs. three-step adhesives: Effect of carbodiimide.

Authors:  Zihou Zhang; Dylan Beitzel; Hessam Majd; Mustafa Mutluay; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  An all-in-one adhesive does not etch beyond hybrid layers.

Authors:  J Kim; S Mai; M R Carrilho; C K Y Yiu; D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 7.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Effect of a non-thermal, atmospheric-pressure, plasma brush on conversion of model self-etch adhesive formulations compared to conventional photo-polymerization.

Authors:  Mingsheng Chen; Ying Zhang; Xiaomei Yao; Hao Li; Qingsong Yu; Yong Wang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Stefanski; Jan W V van Dijken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Changes in stiffness of resin-infiltrated demineralized dentin after remineralization by a bottom-up biomimetic approach.

Authors:  Li-sha Gu; Bradford P Huffman; Dwayne D Arola; Young Kyung Kim; Sui Mai; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Jun-qi Ling; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.