Literature DB >> 1811939

Notochord morphogenesis in Xenopus laevis: simulation of cell behavior underlying tissue convergence and extension.

M Weliky1, S Minsuk, R Keller, G Oster.   

Abstract

Cell intercalation and cell shape changes drive notochord morphogenesis in the African frog, Xenopus laevis. Experimental observations show that cells elongate mediolaterally and intercalate between one another, causing the notochord to lengthen and narrow. Descriptive observations provide few clues as to the mechanisms that coordinate and drive these cell movements. It is possible that a few rules governing cell behavior could orchestrate the shaping of the entire tissue. We test this hypothesis by constructing a computer model of the tissue to investigate how rules governing cell motility and cell-cell interactions can account for the major features of notochord morphogenesis. These rules are drawn from the literature on in vitro cell studies and experimental observations of notochord cell behavior. The following types of motility rules are investigated: (1) refractory tissue boundaries that inhibit cell motility, (2) statistical persistence of motion, (3) contact inhibition of protrusion between cells, and (4) polarized and nonpolarized protrusive activity. We show that only the combination of refractory boundaries, contact inhibition and polarized protrusive activity reproduces normal notochord development. Guided by these rules, cells spontaneously align into a parallel array of elongating cells. Self alignment optimizes the geometric conditions for polarized protrusive activity by progressively minimizing contact inhibition between cells. Cell polarization, initiated at refractory tissue boundaries, spreads along successive cell rows into the tissue interior as cells restrict and constrain their neighbors' directional bias. The model demonstrates that several experimentally observed intrinsic cell behaviors, operating simultaneously, may underlie the generation of coordinated cell movements within the developing notochord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1811939     DOI: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  13 in total

1.  How far can a juxtacrine signal travel?

Authors:  M R Owen; J A Sherratt; S R Myers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Alexander G Fletcher; Miriam Osterfield; Ruth E Baker; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Morphogenetic movements during axolotl neural tube formation tracked by digital imaging.

Authors:  G Wayne Brodland; Michael J Scott; Andrew F MacLean; M Globus; S Vethamany-Globus; R Gordon; Jim H Veldhuis; R Del Maestro
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1996-02

Review 4.  Computational models for mechanics of morphogenesis.

Authors:  Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Zi Chen; Benjamen A Filas; Victor D Varner; Larry A Taber
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2012-06

5.  Growth based morphogenesis of vertebrate limb bud.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Morishita; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 6.  Emergent morphogenesis: elastic mechanics of a self-deforming tissue.

Authors:  Lance A Davidson; Sagar D Joshi; Hye Young Kim; Michelangelo von Dassow; Lin Zhang; Jian Zhou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Cooperation of polarized cell intercalations drives convergence and extension of presomitic mesoderm during zebrafish gastrulation.

Authors:  Chunyue Yin; Maria Kiskowski; Philippe-Alexandre Pouille; Emmanuel Farge; Lilianna Solnica-Krezel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Study on multicellular systems using a phase field model.

Authors:  Makiko Nonomura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Segment-specific adhesion as a driver of convergent extension.

Authors:  Renske M A Vroomans; Paulien Hogeweg; Kirsten H W J ten Tusscher
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  A comparison of computational models for eukaryotic cell shape and motility.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.