Literature DB >> 1810335

Variability of clinical dentin substrates.

E S Duke1, J Lindemuth.   

Abstract

Clinical trials remain the only conclusive research of dentin adhesive performance, but variables unique to the oral environment may influence the results. Dentin variability is one factor that may account for extreme variations in clinical evaluations. Despite the encouraging results of laboratory studies, clinical trials with adhesive systems have been disappointing. Current adhesives are reported to react with dentin surfaces by chemical and/or micro-mechanical mechanisms. Dentin surfaces, such as cervical abrasions, are subject to intraoral changes and dentin tubules commonly become obturated by the growth of peritubular dentin or by the precipitation of calcific deposits within the tubules. The resulting sclerotic dentin may be less receptive to current dentin adhesives. An examination of clinically aged dentin surfaces has revealed an inordinate variability in tubular morphology. The more sclerotic dentin present, the less effective was dentin conditioning and resin composite adaptation. Early correlations with current clinical trials appear to substantiate that the greatest failure of restorations occurred in sclerotic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1810335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  11 in total

1.  Chemical analysis of in vivo-irradiated dentine of head and neck cancer patients by ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Resende de Miranda; Anielle Christine Almeida Silva; Noelio Oliveira Dantas; Carlos José Soares; Veridiana Resende Novais
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Dentin infiltration ability of different classes of adhesive systems.

Authors:  Alina Langer; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Chemical profile of adhesive/caries-affected dentin interfaces using Raman microspectroscopy.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Paulette Spencer; Mary P Walker
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Two-year clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: Influence of subject's age and dentin etching time.

Authors:  David Cardoso Sandes Farias; Guilherme Carpena Lopes; Luiz Narciso Baratieri
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Radiotherapy effect on nano-mechanical properties and chemical composition of enamel and dentine.

Authors:  R Reed; C Xu; Y Liu; J P Gorski; Y Wang; M P Walker
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  The influence of the energy density and other clinical parameters on bond strength of Er:YAG-conditioned dentin compared to conventional dentin adhesion.

Authors:  Gottfried Gisler; Norbert Gutknecht
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results.

Authors:  Mustafa Demirci; Hande Sar Sancakli; Omer Uysal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Abfraction: A review.

Authors:  Gargi S Sarode; Sachin C Sarode
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2013-05

9.  A comparative study of the microtensile bond strength and microstructural differences between sclerotic and Normal dentine after surface pretreatment.

Authors:  Jinhua Wang; Weijian Song; Lei Zhu; Xin Wei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Adhesion of an endodontic sealer to dentin and gutta-percha: shear and push-out bond strength measurements and SEM analysis.

Authors:  Cleonice Silveira Teixeira; Edson Alfredo; Luis Henrique de Camargo Thomé; Ricardo Gariba-Silva; Yara T Correa Silva-Sousa; Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.