Literature DB >> 18097139

Ethical and legal implications in seeking and providing a second medical opinion.

Anthony Axon1, Majid Hassan, Yaron Niv, Christoph Beglinger, Theodore Rokkas.   

Abstract

Ethical and legal implications arise both when seeking a second medical opinion and when providing one. There has been debate as to whether a second opinion for a patient is a right or a concession and whilst today most would consider it to be a patient's right, there are nevertheless some disadvantages associated with seeking a second opinion. This article addresses the reasons why patients seek second opinions, it considers when physicians themselves should refer patients and it covers the issues involved in providing a second opinion particularly in cases where there is the potential for an allegation of malpractice. Finally, the arguments for and against treating patients who are referred for a second opinion are addressed. This paper has been prepared following a round table discussion on this subject, which was addressed during a symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy held in Kos in 2006. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18097139     DOI: 10.1159/000109379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  11 in total

1.  Do first opinions affect second opinions?

Authors:  Geva Vashitz; Joseph S Pliskin; Yisrael Parmet; Yona Kosashvili; Gal Ifergane; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Assessment of Challenges Encountered by Dutch Oncologists When Patients Ask for Second Opinions.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; F J Sherida H Woei-A-Jin; Ellen M A Smets; Pomme E A van Maarschalkerweerd; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Dirkje W Sommeijer
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 3.  Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; Niki M Medendorp; Joost G Daams; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  The effect of medical malpractice liability on rate of referrals received by specialist physicians.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Stephen J Spurr; Bin Nan; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2013-03-26

Review 5.  When Should You Trust Your Doctor? Establishing a Theoretical Model to Evaluate the Value of Second Opinion Visits.

Authors:  Michael Halasy; Jason Shafrin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-04-08

6.  Retrospective analysis of patients self-referred to comprehensive ophthalmology seeking second opinions.

Authors:  Daniel Gologorsky; Scott H Greenstein
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-11

7.  The evolution of uncertainty in second opinions about prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; Caitlin M Gutheil; Ellen M A Smets; Moritz Hansen; Terrence M Kungel; Tania D Strout; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Obtaining a second opinion is a neglected source of health care inequalities.

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-01-16

9.  Association of treatment and outcomes of doctor-shopping behavior in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng-I Hsieh; Kuo-Piao Chung; Ming-Chin Yang; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Second opinions in medical oncology.

Authors:  Ian Olver; Mariko Carey; Jamie Bryant; Allison Boyes; Tiffany Evans; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.