Literature DB >> 18096877

Does faculty development enhance teaching effectiveness?

William D Hendricson1, Eugene Anderson, Sandra C Andrieu, D Gregory Chadwick, James R Cole, Mary C George, Gerald N Glickman, Joel F Glover, Jerold S Goldberg, N Karl Haden, Kenneth L Kalkwarf, Cyril Meyerowitz, Laura M Neumann, Marsha Pyle, Lisa A Tedesco, Richard W Valachovic, Richard G Weaver, Ronald L Winder, Stephen K Young.   

Abstract

Academic dentists and members of the practice community have been hearing, for more than a decade, that our educational system is in trouble and that the profession has lost its vision and may be wavering in the achievement of its goals. A core of consistently recommended reforms has framed the discussion of future directions for dental education, but as yet, most schools report little movement toward implementation of these reforms in spite of persistent advocacy. Provision of faculty development related to teaching and assessment strategies is widely perceived to be the essential ingredient in efforts to introduce new curricular approaches and modify the educational environment in academic dentistry. Analyses of the outcomes of efforts to revise health professions curricula have identified the availability and effectiveness of faculty development as a predictor of the success or failure of reform initiatives. This article will address faculty development for purposes of enhancing teaching effectiveness and preparing instructors for potential new roles associated with curriculum changes. Its overall purpose is to provide information and insights about faculty development that may be useful to dental schools in designing professional growth opportunities for their faculty. Seven questions are addressed: 1) What is faculty development? 2) How is faculty development accomplished? 3) Why is faculty development particularly important in dental education? 4) What happens when faculty development does not accompany educational reform? 5) Why are teaching attitudes and behaviors so difficult to change? 6) What outcomes can be expected from faculty development? and 7) What does the available evidence tell us about the design of faculty development programs? Evidence from systematic reviews pertaining to the teaching of evidence-based dentistry, strategies for continuing professional education, and the Best Evidence in Medical Education review of faculty development outcomes are presented to answer this question: does faculty development enhance teaching effectiveness? Characteristics consistently associated with effective faculty development are described.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  8 in total

1.  Faculty development initiatives to advance research literacy and evidence-based practice at CAM academic institutions.

Authors:  Cynthia R Long; Deborah L Ackerman; Richard Hammerschlag; Louise Delagran; David H Peterson; Michelle Berlin; Roni L Evans
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Advancing evidence informed practice through faculty development: the Northwestern Health Sciences University model.

Authors:  Roni Evans; Louise Delagran; Michele Maiers; Mary Jo Kreitzer; Victor Sierpina
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.775

3.  Teachers' ideas versus experts' descriptions of 'the good teacher' in postgraduate medical education: implications for implementation. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Thea C M van Roermund; Fred Tromp; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Ben J A M Bottema; Herman J Bueving
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  An Assessment of Teaching and Learning Practices: A Questionnaire Study for Dental Educators of Karnataka.

Authors:  S Meenakshi; N Raghunath; H S Shreeshyla
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-11-30

5.  Impact of a Tutored Theoretical-Practical Training to Develop Undergraduate Students' Skills for the Detection of Caries Lesions: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Controlled Randomized Study.

Authors:  Mariana Minatel Braga; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi; Fernanda Rosche Ferreira; Fausto Medeiros Mendes; Daniela Prócida Raggio; José Carlos Imparato; Marcelo Bonecker; Ana Carolina Magalhães; Linda Wang; Daniela Rios; Juliano Pelim Pessan; Cristiane Duque; Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo; Ary Oliveira Alves Filho; Marina De Deus Moura Lima; Marcoeli Silva Moura; Alessandro Diogo De Carli; Mariane Emi Sanabe; Maximiliano Sergio Cenci; Elenara Ferreira Oliveira; Marcos Britto Correa; Rachel Oliveira Rocha; Julio Eduardo Zenkner; Pedroza Uribe Murisí; Stefania Martignon; Juan Sebastian Lara; Fatima Gabriela Aquino; Alfredo Carrillo; Chun Hung Chu; Chris Deery; David Ricketts; Paulo Melo; José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes; Kim Rud Ekstrand
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-08-16

6.  Current Implementation of Digital Dentistry for Removable Prosthodontics in US Dental Schools.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ishida; Yukinori Kuwajima; Takuya Kobayashi; Yu Yonezawa; Derek Asack; Manavi Nagai; Hisatomo Kondo; Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai; John Da Silva; Sang J Lee
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-04-15

7.  Implementing Faculty Development Programs in Medical Education Utilizing Kirkpatrick's Model.

Authors:  Abdulaziz I Alhassan
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Current Undergraduate Dental Implantology Teaching in UK.

Authors:  Arminder Hare; Samantha Bird; Simon Wright; Cemal Ucer; Rabia Sannam Khan
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.