BACKGROUND & AIMS: Wireless capsule endoscopy provides an opportunity to study the macroscopic features in celiac disease by providing a magnified view of the intestinal mucosa. In this study, we evaluated the following: (1) the distribution of atrophy in untreated celiac disease, (2) the correlation between extent of changes and clinical manifestations, (3) the accuracy and interobserver agreement of wireless capsule endoscopy assessment, and (4) the effect of gluten withdrawal. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with untreated biopsy-proven celiac disease underwent wireless capsule endoscopy. Each subject was invited to undergo repeat testing after at least 6 months of gluten withdrawal. The video images of each patient were reviewed independently by 2 investigators. RESULTS: Thirty-five (92%) subjects had visible atrophy detected by capsule endoscopy. Twenty-two (59%) subjects showed an extensive enteropathy, 12 (32%) had enteropathy limited to the duodenum, and only 1 had a jejunal enteropathy. No association was shown between the extent of the lesion and clinical manifestations. Capsule endoscopy had a better overall sensitivity for the detection of atrophy as compared with upper endoscopy (92% vs 55%, P = .0005), with a specificity of 100%. The overall interobserver agreement for the 2 reviewers was relatively high (% total agreement, 86.5%). After gluten withdrawal, the extent and the pattern of atrophy improved both qualitatively and quantitatively. CONCLUSIONS: Celiac disease affects a highly variable portion of the small intestine starting at the duodenum. The extent of visible enteropathy does not explain differences in clinical presentation. Most subjects with visually detected villous atrophy showed a clinically significant improvement after gluten withdrawal.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Wireless capsule endoscopy provides an opportunity to study the macroscopic features in celiac disease by providing a magnified view of the intestinal mucosa. In this study, we evaluated the following: (1) the distribution of atrophy in untreated celiac disease, (2) the correlation between extent of changes and clinical manifestations, (3) the accuracy and interobserver agreement of wireless capsule endoscopy assessment, and (4) the effect of gluten withdrawal. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with untreated biopsy-proven celiac disease underwent wireless capsule endoscopy. Each subject was invited to undergo repeat testing after at least 6 months of gluten withdrawal. The video images of each patient were reviewed independently by 2 investigators. RESULTS: Thirty-five (92%) subjects had visible atrophy detected by capsule endoscopy. Twenty-two (59%) subjects showed an extensive enteropathy, 12 (32%) had enteropathy limited to the duodenum, and only 1 had a jejunal enteropathy. No association was shown between the extent of the lesion and clinical manifestations. Capsule endoscopy had a better overall sensitivity for the detection of atrophy as compared with upper endoscopy (92% vs 55%, P = .0005), with a specificity of 100%. The overall interobserver agreement for the 2 reviewers was relatively high (% total agreement, 86.5%). After gluten withdrawal, the extent and the pattern of atrophy improved both qualitatively and quantitatively. CONCLUSIONS:Celiac disease affects a highly variable portion of the small intestine starting at the duodenum. The extent of visible enteropathy does not explain differences in clinical presentation. Most subjects with visually detected villous atrophy showed a clinically significant improvement after gluten withdrawal.
Authors: Ivor D Hill; Martha H Dirks; Gregory S Liptak; Richard B Colletti; Alessio Fasano; Stefano Guandalini; Edward J Hoffenberg; Karoly Horvath; Joseph A Murray; Mitchell Pivor; Ernest G Seidman Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Giovanni Cammarota; Giuseppe A Pirozzi; Antonio Martino; Giuseppe Zuccalà; Rossella Cianci; Lucio Cuoco; Veronica Ojetti; Matteo Landriscina; Massimo Montalto; Fabio M Vecchio; Giovanni Gasbarrini; Antonio Gasbarrini Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Edward J Ciaccio; Govind Bhagat; Christina A Tennyson; Suzanne K Lewis; Lincoln Hernandez; Peter H R Green Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Rupa Mukherjee; Ikenna Egbuna; Pardeep Brar; Lincoln Hernandez; Donald J McMahon; Elizabeth J Shane; Govind Bhagat; Peter H R Green Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: David S Atlas; Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Carol T Van Dyke; Brian D Lahr; Joseph A Murray Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Hugh James Freeman; Angeli Chopra; Michael Tom Clandinin; Alan Br Thomson Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 5.742