Literature DB >> 18094423

Pharmacokinetic and tumor distribution characteristics of temsirolimus in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

John G Kuhn1, Susan M Chang, Patrick Y Wen, Timothy F Cloughesy, Harry Greenberg, David Schiff, Charles Conrad, Karen L Fink, H Ian Robins, Minesh Mehta, Lisa DeAngelis, Jeffrey Raizer, Kenneth Hess, Kathleen R Lamborn, Janet Dancey, Michael D Prados.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus and its major metabolite, sirolimus, in patients receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) compared with patients receiving non-EIAEDs. An additional objective was to determine whether concentrations of temsirolimus or sirolimus were achieved in brain tumor tissue. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with recurrent malignant gliomas not receiving EIAEDs initially received temsirolimus weekly at a dose of 250 mg i.v. The dose was subsequently reduced to 170 mg due to intolerable side effects. For patients taking EIAEDs, the starting dose of temsirolimus was 250 mg with standard dose escalation until the maximal tolerated dose was established. Ten whole blood samples were obtained over a period of 24 h after administration of temsirolimus for pharmacokinetic assessments. Patients eligible for cytoreductive surgery received temsirolimus before tumor resection. Whole blood and tumor tissue were obtained for analysis.
RESULTS: Significant differences in the pharmacokinetic variables for temsirolimus and sirolimus were observed between the two patient groups at a comparable dose level of 250 mg. For patients receiving EIAEDs, the systemic exposure to temsirolimus was lower by 1.5-fold. Likewise, peak concentrations and exposure to sirolimus were lower by 2-fold. Measurable concentrations of temsirolimus and sirolimus were observed in brain tumor specimens. The average tissue to whole blood ratio for temsirolimus was 1.43 and 0.84 for sirolimus.
CONCLUSIONS: Drugs that induce cytochrome P450 3A4, such as EIAEDs, significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus and its active metabolite, sirolimus. Total exposure to temsirolimus and sirolimus was lower in the EIAED group at the maximum tolerated dose of 250 mg compared with the non-EIAED group at the maximum tolerated dose of 170 mg. However, brain tumor tissue concentrations of temsirolimus and sirolimus were relatively comparable in both groups of patients at their respective dose levels. Correlative analyses of the tissue for the inhibition of the key regulators (p70S6 kinase and 4E-binding protein 1) of mammalian target of rapamycin are necessary to define the therapeutic significance of the altered exposure to temsirolimus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18094423      PMCID: PMC4918812          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  PI 3-kinase, mTOR, protein synthesis and cancer.

Authors:  P K Vogt
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  Phase II trial of temsirolimus (CCI-779) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

Authors:  Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Matthew J Maurer; Jeffrey I Kreisberg; Karla Ballman; J Boni; Josep M Peralba; Robert B Jenkins; Shaker R Dakhil; Roscoe F Morton; Kurt A Jaeckle; Bernd W Scheithauer; Janet Dancey; Manuel Hidalgo; Daniel J Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Phase II study of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Susan M Chang; Patrick Wen; Timothy Cloughesy; Harry Greenberg; David Schiff; Charles Conrad; Karen Fink; H Ian Robins; Lisa De Angelis; Jeffrey Raizer; Kenneth Hess; Ken Aldape; Kathleen R Lamborn; John Kuhn; Janet Dancey; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temsirolimus (CCI-779) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Manuel Hidalgo; Jan C Buckner; Charles Erlichman; Marilyn S Pollack; Joseph P Boni; Gary Dukart; Bonnie Marshall; Lisa Speicher; Laurence Moore; Eric K Rowinsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents.

Authors:  Sandrine Faivre; Guido Kroemer; Eric Raymond
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of CCI-779: correlations to safety and pharmacogenomic responses in patients with advanced renal cancer.

Authors:  Joseph P Boni; Cathie Leister; Gregor Bender; Virginia Fitzpatrick; Natalie Twine; Jennifer Stover; Andrew Dorner; Fred Immermann; Michael E Burczynski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Recent developments in targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase pathway.

Authors:  Piotr Smolewski
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of escalated doses of weekly intravenous infusion of CCI-779, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Eric Raymond; Jérôme Alexandre; Sandrine Faivre; Karina Vera; Eric Materman; Joseph Boni; Cathie Leister; Joan Korth-Bradley; Axel Hanauske; Jean-Pierre Armand
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Randomized phase II study of multiple dose levels of CCI-779, a novel mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael B Atkins; Manuel Hidalgo; Walter M Stadler; Theodore F Logan; Janice P Dutcher; Gary R Hudes; Young Park; Song-Heng Liou; Bonnie Marshall; Joseph P Boni; Gary Dukart; Matthew L Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Pten signaling in gliomas.

Authors:  Christiane B Knobbe; Adrian Merlo; Guido Reifenberger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.300

View more
  36 in total

1.  Phase 0 and window of opportunity clinical trial design in neuro-oncology: a RANO review.

Authors:  Michael A Vogelbaum; Daria Krivosheya; Hamid Borghei-Razavi; Nader Sanai; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Riccardo Soffietti; David A Reardon; Manish K Aghi; Evanthia Galanis; Patrick Y Wen; Martin van den Bent; Susan Chang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  A phase I study of temozolomide and everolimus (RAD001) in patients with newly diagnosed and progressive glioblastoma either receiving or not receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants: an NCIC CTG study.

Authors:  Warren P Mason; Mary Macneil; Petr Kavan; Jacob Easaw; David Macdonald; Brian Thiessen; Shweta Urva; Zarnie Lwin; Lynn McIntosh; Elizabeth Eisenhauer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Rapamycin with antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma: an AIDS Malignancy Consortium study.

Authors:  Susan E Krown; Debasmita Roy; Jeannette Y Lee; Bruce J Dezube; Erin G Reid; Raman Venkataramanan; Kelong Han; Ethel Cesarman; Dirk P Dittmer
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 4.  Toward precision medicine in glioblastoma: the promise and the challenges.

Authors:  Michael D Prados; Sara A Byron; Nhan L Tran; Joanna J Phillips; Annette M Molinaro; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; John G Kuhn; Ingo K Mellinghoff; John F de Groot; Howard Colman; Timothy F Cloughesy; Susan M Chang; Timothy C Ryken; Waibhav D Tembe; Jeffrey A Kiefer; Michael E Berens; David W Craig; John D Carpten; Jeffrey M Trent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Phase 2 trial of erlotinib plus sirolimus in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Sridharan Gururangan; Allan H Friedman; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; Julie A Norfleet; Roger E McLendon; John H Sampson; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Dual mTORC2/mTORC1 targeting results in potent suppressive effects on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progenitors.

Authors:  Jessica K Altman; Antonella Sassano; Surinder Kaur; Heather Glaser; Barbara Kroczynska; Amanda J Redig; Suzanne Russo; Sharon Barr; Leonidas C Platanias
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  GPCRs in stem cell function.

Authors:  Van A Doze; Dianne M Perez
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.622

8.  A pilot microdialysis study in brain tumor patients to assess changes in intracerebral cytokine levels after craniotomy and in response to treatment with a targeted anti-cancer agent.

Authors:  Jana Portnow; Behnam Badie; Xueli Liu; Paul Frankel; Shu Mi; Mike Chen; Timothy W Synold
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  Radiation-agent combinations for glioblastoma: challenges in drug development and future considerations.

Authors:  Charles A Kunos; Evanthia Galanis; Jeffrey Buchsbaum; Qian Shi; Lewis C Strauss; C Norman Coleman; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Intratumoral concentrations of imatinib after oral administration in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Matthias Holdhoff; Jeffrey G Supko; Gary L Gallia; Christine L Hann; David Bonekamp; Xiaobu Ye; Bing Cao; Alessandro Olivi; Stuart A Grossman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.