Literature DB >> 18093571

Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics.

Ana M Wintergerst1, Gaylord S Throckmorton, Peter H Buschang.   

Abstract

This study analysed how bolus hardness and size affect within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics. Two independent prospective studies were performed; both tracked chin movements using an optoelectronic recording system. Computer programs identified each subject's ten most representative cycles, and multilevel modelling procedures were used to estimate variances. One study evaluated 38 subjects who chewed 1, 2, 4 or 8 g of gum presented in random order. The second study evaluated 26 subjects who chewed approximately 2.5 g of harder (670 g) or softer (440 g) gum, also presented in random order. In terms of bolus size, the 2g and 1g boluses produced the least and greatest relative within-subject variability, respectively; the largest differences were found for cycle duration and excursions. Within-subject variability when chewing the harder gum was consistently greater than when chewing the softer gum, except for lateral movement towards the balancing side. Because bolus hardness and bolus size influence within-subject variability differently, they must be taken into consideration when designing experiments to study masticatory kinematics. We conclude that a 2g bolus of soft gum should be used in studies of chewing cycle kinematics in order to reduce within-subject variability and increase statistical power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18093571     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  5 in total

1.  Frequency of stage II oral transport cycles in healthy human.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Martin B Brodsky; Marlís González-Fernández; Mitsumasa Yoda; Takashi Hiraoka; Koichiro Matsuo; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Age-related changes in neuromotor function when performing a concurrent motor task.

Authors:  Brittany Samulski; Jessica Prebor; Cortney Armitano-Lago; Steven Morrison
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Masticatory performance and chewing cycle kinematics-are they related?

Authors:  Casey Lepley; Gaylord Throckmorton; Sarah Parker; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Model identification of stomatognathic muscle system activity during mastication.

Authors:  Edward Kijak; Jerzy Margielewicz; Danuta Lietz-Kijak; Katarzyna Wilemska-Kucharzewska; Marek Kucharzewski; Zbigniew Śliwiński
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Effect of attention on chewing and swallowing behaviors in healthy humans.

Authors:  Hirokazu Ashiga; Eri Takei; Jin Magara; Ryosuke Takeishi; Takanori Tsujimura; Kouta Nagoya; Makoto Inoue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.