Literature DB >> 18092926

The slow pace of interactive video telemedicine adoption: the perspective of telemedicine program administrators on physician participation.

Bill Grigsby1, Angela G Brega, Rachael E Bennett, Patricia A Devore, Marsha J Paulich, Sylvia G Talkington, Natasha R Floersch, Phoebe L Barton, Susannah Neal, Tesfa M Araya, Jeff L Loker, Neil Krohn, Jim Grigsby.   

Abstract

We conducted semistructured interviews with telemedicine program administrators as part of a national survey of physicians and managers regarding attitudes toward, and knowledge of, telemedicine. Telemedicine administrators were interviewed regarding factors affecting physician adoption of interactive video (IAV) telemedicine. The seven networks with which these managers were affiliated represented "traditional" telemedicine programs, primarily providing specialty teleconsultation via IAV. These programs were located in different geographic regions, and included both consulting and referring sites. We include data only for well-established networks for which multiple administrators responded. Data were analyzed using standard qualitative research methods. We conclude that reimbursement issues are important determinants of the rate of adoption, but that by themselves they do not fully account for the slow diffusion of IAV telemedicine. Likewise, appeals to physicians as rational decision-makers are necessary but insufficient means of increasing the volume of telemedicine within a network. Telemedicine networks and administrators that have been effective in persuading physicians to practice telemedicine or to refer patients demonstrate an emphasis on aggressive recruitment of physicians who will be involved actively in one or the other role. Most efforts to encourage physicians to adopt telemedicine, however, have focused on the supply of specialists, rather than stimulating demand among primary care providers who have patients to refer. Habit was identified as an important, albeit overlooked, factor explaining physician adoption of telemedicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18092926     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  15 in total

1.  Telemedicine uptake among Genetics Professionals in Europe: room for expansion.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The diffusion of telehealth in rural American Indian communities: a retrospective survey of key stakeholders.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brooks; Spero M Manson; Byron Bair; Nancy Dailey; Jay H Shore
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Telestroke Adoption Among Community Hospitals in North Carolina: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Christopher M Shea; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Kea Turner; Steve North; Kristin L Reiter
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 5.  Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Leila Beheshti; Leila R Kalankesh; Leila Doshmangir; Mostafa Farahbakhsh
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

6.  Perceptions of video-based appointments from the patient's home: a patient survey.

Authors:  Matthew R Gardner; Sarah M Jenkins; Daniel A O'Neil; Douglas L Wood; Barbara R Spurrier; Sandhya Pruthi
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.536

7.  Telehealth and Medicare: payment policy, current use, and prospects for growth.

Authors:  Matlin Gilman; Jeff Stensland
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-12-04

Review 8.  Scope of policy issues in eHealth: results from a structured literature review.

Authors:  Shariq Khoja; Hammad Durrani; Parvez Nayani; Ammad Fahim
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Amir Talaei-Khoei; Holly Seale; Pradeep Ray; C Raina Macintyre
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16

10.  Home videophones improve direct observation in tuberculosis treatment: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Victoria A Wade; Jonathan Karnon; Jaklin A Eliott; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.