Literature DB >> 18092660

Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: evidence to support a proposal for an early interval surgery.

Jee K Low1, Paul Barrow, Anas Owera, Basil J Ammori.   

Abstract

We evaluated the safety and feasibility of delayed urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed beyond 72 hours to overcome the logistical difficulties in performing early urgent LC within 72 hours of admission with acute cholecystitis (AC), and to avoid earlier readmission with recurrent AC in patients awaiting delayed interval. Patients admitted with AC were scheduled for urgent LC. Patients who underwent early urgent LC were compared with those who had delayed urgent surgery. Fifty consecutive patients underwent urgent LC for AC within 2 weeks of admission. There were no conversions and no bile duct injuries. Delayed surgery (n=36) neither prolonged operating time (90 vs. 85 minutes), nor increased operative morbidity (9.7% vs. 7.7%) or mortality (2.4% vs. 7.7%) compared with early surgery (n=14). Although delayed surgery was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, P = 0.029), it prolonged total hospital stay (9 vs. 5 days, P < 0.0001). Delay of LC beyond 72 hours neither increases operative difficulty nor prolongs recovery. It might be more cost effective to schedule patients who could not undergo early urgent LC but are responding to conservative treatment for an early interval LC within 2 weeks of presentation with AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18092660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Variations in the preoperative resources use and the practice pattern in Japanese cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after more than 6 weeks on easily controlled cholecystitis patients.

Authors:  Whanbong Lee; Jungnam Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

Review 3.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Amy M Cao; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Christopher J Davidson; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Sue K Down; Marko Nicolic; Hibba Abdulkarim; Nick Skelton; Adrian H Harris; Yashwant Koak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Feasibility and Safety of Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis After 4 Days from Symptom Onset.

Authors:  Go Shinke; Takehiro Noda; Hisanori Hatano; Junzo Shimizu; Masashi Hirota; Akihiro Takata; Kazuteru Oshima; Tsukasa Tanida; Takamichi Komori; Shunji Morita; Hiroshi Imamura; Takashi Iwazawa; Kenzo Akagi; Keizo Dono
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Chronic cholecystitis in the pediatric population: an underappreciated disease process.

Authors:  Brian P Blackwood; Julia Grabowski
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2017

8.  Operative timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a Japanese institute.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohta; Yukio Iwashita; Kazuhiro Yada; Tadashi Ogawa; Seiichiro Kai; Tetsuya Ishio; Kohei Shibata; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Toshio Bandoh; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.