CONTEXT: Primary care physicians provide care for the majority of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although clinical practice guidelines have been developed for COPD, their influence on primary care practice is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine primary care decision making, perceptions, and educational needs relating to COPD. DESIGN: A survey centered on COPD case-vignettes was developed and distributed to a random sample of physicians in adult primary care specialties. RESULTS: From 943 respondents, 784 practicing primary care physicians were used in analysis. On average, physicians estimated that 12% of their patients had COPD. Although 55% of physicians were aware of major COPD guidelines, only 25% used them to guide decision-making. Self-identified guidelines showed that users were more likely to order spirometry for subtle respiratory symptoms (74% vs 63%, P < .01), to initiate therapy for mild symptoms (86% vs. 77%, P < .01), and to choose long-acting bronchodilators for persistent dyspnea (50% vs 32%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Practice guidelines and CME programs are both valued resources, but have not yet adequately reached many physicians. Because guidelines appear to influence clinical decision-making, efforts to disseminate them more broadly are needed. Future education should present COPD assessment algorithms tailored to primary care settings, assess and strengthen spirometry interpretation skills, and discuss a reasoned approach to medication management. Patient-centered content that accurately reflects the nature of primary care practice may enhance physician's learning experience. Internet-based and distance learning formats may be essential for reaching physicians in many high-need areas.
CONTEXT: Primary care physicians provide care for the majority of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although clinical practice guidelines have been developed for COPD, their influence on primary care practice is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine primary care decision making, perceptions, and educational needs relating to COPD. DESIGN: A survey centered on COPD case-vignettes was developed and distributed to a random sample of physicians in adult primary care specialties. RESULTS: From 943 respondents, 784 practicing primary care physicians were used in analysis. On average, physicians estimated that 12% of their patients had COPD. Although 55% of physicians were aware of major COPD guidelines, only 25% used them to guide decision-making. Self-identified guidelines showed that users were more likely to order spirometry for subtle respiratory symptoms (74% vs 63%, P < .01), to initiate therapy for mild symptoms (86% vs. 77%, P < .01), and to choose long-acting bronchodilators for persistent dyspnea (50% vs 32%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Practice guidelines and CME programs are both valued resources, but have not yet adequately reached many physicians. Because guidelines appear to influence clinical decision-making, efforts to disseminate them more broadly are needed. Future education should present COPD assessment algorithms tailored to primary care settings, assess and strengthen spirometry interpretation skills, and discuss a reasoned approach to medication management. Patient-centered content that accurately reflects the nature of primary care practice may enhance physician's learning experience. Internet-based and distance learning formats may be essential for reaching physicians in many high-need areas.
Authors: David B Price; David G Tinkelman; R J Halbert; Robert J Nordyke; Sharon Isonaka; Dmitry Nonikov; Elizabeth F Juniper; Daryl Freeman; Thomas Hausen; Mark L Levy; Anders Ostrem; Thys van der Molen; Constant P van Schayck Journal: Respiration Date: 2005-12-05 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Peter Glassman; Sharad Jain; Joyce Hansen; Maureen Spell; Martin Lee Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-11-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Xavier Perez; Juan P Wisnivesky; Linda Lurslurchachai; Lawrence C Kleinman; Ian M Kronish Journal: Respir Med Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Kathryn L Colborn; Laura Helmkamp; Bruce G Bender; Bethany M Kwan; Lisa M Schilling; Marion R Sills Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Pat G Camp; Munaza Chaudhry; Howard Platt; Michael Roch; Jeremy Road; Donald Sin; Robert D Levy Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Sandra G Adams; Jennifer Pitts; JoEllen Wynne; Barbara P Yawn; Edward J Diamond; Shuko Lee; Ed Dellert; Nicola A Hanania Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Gregory D Salinas; James C Williamson; Ravi Kalhan; Byron Thomashow; Jodi L Scheckermann; John Walsh; Maziar Abdolrasulnia; Jill A Foster Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2011-02-28