Literature DB >> 30610140

Colorado Asthma Toolkit Implementation Improves Some Process Measures of Asthma Care.

Kathryn L Colborn1, Laura Helmkamp2, Bruce G Bender2, Bethany M Kwan2, Lisa M Schilling2, Marion R Sills2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Colorado Asthma Toolkit Program (CATP) has been shown to improve processes of care with less evidence demonstrating improved outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To model the association between pre-and-post-CATP status and asthma-related process and outcome measures among patients ages 5 to 64 years receiving care in safety-net primary care practices.
METHODS: This is an implementation study involving secondary prepost analysis of existing structured clinical, administrative, and claims data. Nine primary care practices in a federally qualified health center network implemented the CATP. Processes of care and health and utilization outcomes were evaluated prepost implementation in a cohort of patients with asthma using generalized linear mixed models.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 2678 patients age 5 to 64 years with at least one visit to one of the 9 participating practices during the study period (March 12, 2010 to December 1, 2012). A comparison of 12 months pre- and post-CATP implementation showed improvement in some process measures of asthma care associated with the intervention, including the rate of asthma-severity measurement, although no change in 2 Health care Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures: asthma medication ratio and medication management for people with asthma. We also found no change in asthma outcomes measured across multiple domains: exacerbations, utilization, symptom scores, and pulmonary physiology measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the CATP in a primary care setting led to some improved processes of asthma care, but no changes in measured outcomes. Recommendations for future work include supplemental follow-up training including case review. © Copyright 2019 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma; Colorado; Outcomes Assessment; Primary Health Care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30610140      PMCID: PMC6943943          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.180155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  44 in total

1.  Bridging the digital divide: reaching vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Betty L Chang; Suzanne Bakken; S Scott Brown; Thomas K Houston; Gary L Kreps; Rita Kukafka; Charles Safran; P Zoe Stavri
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Knowledge and use of office spirometry for the detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by primary care physicians.

Authors:  David A Kaminsky; Theodore W Marcy; Mark Bachand; Charles G Irvin
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lisa M Klesges; David A Dzewaltowski; Paul A Estabrooks; Thomas M Vogt
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-08-31

Review 4.  Asthma outcomes: exacerbations.

Authors:  Anne Fuhlbrigge; David Peden; Andrea J Apter; Homer A Boushey; Carlos A Camargo; James Gern; Peter W Heymann; Fernando D Martinez; David Mauger; William G Teague; Carol Blaisdell
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Short-term clinical outcomes of acute treatment of childhood asthma.

Authors:  Javier Benito-Fernández
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-06

6.  Choosing wisely: adherence by physicians to recommended use of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of adult asthma.

Authors:  Kristin C Sokol; Gulshan Sharma; Yu-Li Lin; Randall M Goldblum
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A randomized controlled trial on office spirometry in asthma and COPD in standard general practice: data from spirometry in Asthma and COPD: a comparative evaluation Italian study.

Authors:  Mirco Lusuardi; Fernando De Benedetto; Pierluigi Paggiaro; Claudio M Sanguinetti; Giancarlo Brazzola; Paolo Ferri; Claudio F Donner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Barriers to adherence to asthma management guidelines among inner-city primary care providers.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Jessica Lorenzo; Richard Lyn-Cook; Thomas Newman; Adam Aponte; Elizabeth Kiefer; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.347

9.  Do practices comply with key recommendations of the British Asthma Guideline? If not, why not?

Authors:  Sharon Wiener-Ogilvie; Hilary Pinnock; Guro Huby; Aziz Sheikh; Martyn R Partridge; John Gillies
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2007-12

10.  Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) Technology Infrastructure for a Distributed Data Network.

Authors:  Lisa M Schilling; Bethany M Kwan; Charles T Drolshagen; Patrick W Hosokawa; Elias Brandt; Wilson D Pace; Christopher Uhrich; Michael Kamerick; Aidan Bunting; Philip R O Payne; William E Stephens; Joseph M George; Mark Vance; Kelli Giacomini; Jason Braddy; Mika K Green; Michael G Kahn
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2013-10-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Maria Bolshakova; Barbara J Turner; Jennifer Dinalo; Danielle Rose; Aneesa Motala; Ning Fu; Chase G Clemesha; Lisa Rubenstein; Susan Stockdale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 2.  Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?

Authors:  Monica J Fletcher; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Janwillem W H Kocks; Andrew Cave; Chi Chunhua; Jaime Correia de Sousa; Miguel Román-Rodríguez; Mike Thomas; Peter Kardos; Carol Stonham; Ee Ming Khoo; David Leather; Thys van der Molen
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.871

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.