OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a medical emergency team (MET) review for the MET syndromes of acute change in conscious state or arrhythmia and to assess the effect of delayed MET activation on their outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of medical records. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two cohorts of 100 patients for each of the MET syndromes of acute change in conscious state or arrhythmia. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected information on patient demographics, comorbidities, and presence of sepsis, hypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and patient outcome. We also documented the presence and duration of delayed MET activation. The median age for both syndromes was >70 yrs, and major comorbidities were present in >10% of patients. A history of ischemic heart disease (p < .001) and congestive cardiac failure (p = .007) was more common in patients with arrhythmias. Cardiogenic shock and sepsis were common underlying causes of the MET calls for the two groups. However, cardiogenic shock was more common in patients with arrhythmias (p < .001). Hospital mortality was 35% for patients with an acute change in conscious state, compared with 18% for patients with arrhythmias (p = .01). Delayed MET activation occurred in 35% of acute change in conscious state patients and in 24% of arrhythmia patients (p = .09) with a median duration of delay of 16 and 13 hrs, respectively. Delayed MET activation was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.6, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: An acute change in conscious state leading to a MET call carried a greater risk of death than activation due to arrhythmias. Delayed activation was common for both syndromes and was independently associated with an increased risk of death.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a medical emergency team (MET) review for the MET syndromes of acute change in conscious state or arrhythmia and to assess the effect of delayed MET activation on their outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of medical records. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two cohorts of 100 patients for each of the MET syndromes of acute change in conscious state or arrhythmia. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected information on patient demographics, comorbidities, and presence of sepsis, hypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and patient outcome. We also documented the presence and duration of delayed MET activation. The median age for both syndromes was >70 yrs, and major comorbidities were present in >10% of patients. A history of ischemic heart disease (p < .001) and congestive cardiac failure (p = .007) was more common in patients with arrhythmias. Cardiogenic shock and sepsis were common underlying causes of the MET calls for the two groups. However, cardiogenic shock was more common in patients with arrhythmias (p < .001). Hospital mortality was 35% for patients with an acute change in conscious state, compared with 18% for patients with arrhythmias (p = .01). Delayed MET activation occurred in 35% of acute change in conscious state patients and in 24% of arrhythmiapatients (p = .09) with a median duration of delay of 16 and 13 hrs, respectively. Delayed MET activation was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.6, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: An acute change in conscious state leading to a MET call carried a greater risk of death than activation due to arrhythmias. Delayed activation was common for both syndromes and was independently associated with an increased risk of death.
Authors: Jae-Uk Song; Gee Young Suh; Hye Yun Park; So Yeon Lim; Seo Goo Han; Yeh Rim Kang; O Jung Kwon; Sookyoung Woo; Kyeongman Jeon Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Clarence H Braddock; Nancy Szaflarski; Lynn Forsey; Lynn Abel; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John Morton Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexandre Tran; Shannon M Fernando; Daniel I McIsaac; Bram Rochwerg; Garrick Mok; Andrew J E Seely; Dalibor Kubelik; Kenji Inaba; Dennis Y Kim; Peter M Reardon; Jennifer Shen; Peter Tanuseputro; Kednapa Thavorn; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Christopher B Sankey; Gail McAvay; Jonathan M Siner; Carol L Barsky; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eliezer L Bose; Gilles Clermont; Lujie Chen; Artur W Dubrawski; Dianxu Ren; Leslie A Hoffman; Michael R Pinsky; Marilyn Hravnak Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Marilyn Hravnak; Michael A Devita; Amy Clontz; Leslie Edwards; Cynthia Valenta; Michael R Pinsky Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: R Scott Evans; Kathryn G Kuttler; Kathy J Simpson; Stephen Howe; Peter F Crossno; Kyle V Johnson; Misty N Schreiner; James F Lloyd; William H Tettelbach; Roger K Keddington; Alden Tanner; Chelbi Wilde; Terry P Clemmer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.497