Literature DB >> 18091488

Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.

Joshua T Snyder1, Michael N Tzermiadianos, Alexander J Ghanayem, Leonard I Voronov, Anthony Rinella, Andrew Dooris, Gerard Carandang, Susan M Renner, Robert M Havey, Avinash G Patwardhan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of uncinatectomy on cervical motion after total disc replacement (TDR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effect of uncinatectomy on TDR motion is unknown. Partial uncinatectomy may be required to decompress the foramen; however, the residual uncinates can potentially limit TDR motion and serve as a source of progressive spondylosis. Complete resection of the uncinates may decrease this risk yet endanger destabilizing the segment.
METHODS: Seven human cervical spines (C3-C7) (age, 63.4 +/- 6.9 years) were tested first intact and then after implantation of a metal-on-polyethylene ball-and-socket semiconstrained prosthesis at C5-C6. Following this, gradually increased uncinatectomy was performed in the following order: 1) right partial-posteromedial (two thirds), 2) right complete, and 3) bilateral complete resection. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (+/-1.5 Nm). Flexion-extension was tested under 150 N follower preload.
RESULTS: TDR without uncinatectomy increased C5-C6 flexion-extension range of motion from 8.4 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees to 11.6 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees, but statistical significance was not reached (P > 0.05). Lateral bending decreased from 6.2 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees to 3.1 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees, with a trend for statistical significance (P = 0.07). Axial rotation decreased from 5.5 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees to 4.3 degrees +/- 1.4 degrees after the implantation (P > 0.05). Both right partial and right complete uncinatectomy resulted in nearly symmetrical restoration of lateral bending to intact values and significantly increased flexion-extension compared with intact (P < or = 0.05); however, axial rotation still did not differ from intact (P > 0.05). Complete bilateral resection also restored lateral bending to intact values (7.3 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees, P > 0.05); however, it resulted in significant increase in range of motion in flexion-extension (14.1 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees, P < or = 0.05) and axial rotation (8.7 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees, P < or = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Unilateral complete or even partial uncinatectomy can normalize lateral bending after TDR. Bilateral complete uncinatectomy is not necessary to restore lateral bending and may result in significantly increased range of motion in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with intact values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18091488     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815cd482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sophie Campana; Sylvain Persohn; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; M N Tzermiadianos; P P Tsitsopoulos; L I Voronov; S M Renner; M L Reo; G Carandang; K Ritter-Lang; R M Havey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sabina Champain; Sophie Campana; Aymen Ramadan; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Juliane Zenner; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Are Controversial Issues in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Resolved or Unresolved?: A Review of Literature and Recent Updates.

Authors:  Chun-Kun Park; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

7.  Analysis of the morphometric change in the uncinate process of the cervical spondylosis patients: A study of radiological anatomy.

Authors:  Shangbin Cui; Al-Attar E Nasser; Ling Ma; Peiqiang Su; Deying Su; Zhiheng Liao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.

Authors:  Richard D Guyer; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Gerard Carandang; Kenneth R Blank; Stephanie Werner; Josh Rubin; Nick Padovani; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2018-12-17

9.  A Retrospective Review of Radiographic and Clinical Findings from the M6 Cervical Prosthesis.

Authors:  İsmail Oltulu; Özgür Korkmaz; Ender Sarıoğlu; Mehmet Aydoğan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-08-20

10.  The Assessment of Paravertebral Ossification Progression After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Based on CT Images: A Long-term Follow-up.

Authors:  Cheng Zeng; Wei Tian; Bo Liu; Mingxing Fan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.