Literature DB >> 18091444

Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care.

Nir Menachemi1, Askar Chukmaitov, Charles Saunders, Robert G Brooks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption.
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals.
METHODS: Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
RESULTS: Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2%) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8%) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50%) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18091444     DOI: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  16 in total

1.  A nationwide survey of trauma center information technology leverage capacity for mental health comorbidity screening.

Authors:  Erik G Van Eaton; Douglas F Zatzick; Thomas H Gallagher; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Frederick P Rivara; David R Flum; Roselyn Peterson; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Emerging technologies in orthopaedics: Are we ready for the challenge?

Authors:  Vivek Trikha
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06

3.  Meaningful Use and Hospital Performance on Post-Acute Utilization Indicators.

Authors:  Yanick N Brice; Karen E Joynt; Christopher P Tompkins; Grant A Ritter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes.

Authors:  A Hincapie; T Warholak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The effect of hospital electronic health record adoption on nurse-assessed quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Ann Kutney-Lee; Deena Kelly
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.737

6.  Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa; T S Raghu; Benjamin B M Shao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The association between health information exchange and measures of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J R Vest; T R Miller
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Impact of Patient Census and Admission Mortality on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Electronic Health Record Activity: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Conrad Krawiec; Christy Stetter; Lan Kong; Paul Haidet
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Assessing the process of designing and implementing electronic health records in a statewide public health system: the case of Colima, Mexico.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Hernández-Ávila; Lina Sofia Palacio-Mejía; Agustín Lara-Esqueda; Eva Silvestre; Marcela Agudelo-Botero; Mark L Diana; David R Hotchkiss; Beatriz Plaza; Alicia Sanchez Parbul
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Nir Menachemi; Taleah H Collum
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.