Literature DB >> 18090495

Imaging low-risk prostate cancer.

Amita Shukla-Dave1, Hedvig Hricak, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate-specific antigen screening has led to a downstaging of prostate cancer that has resulted in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of the disease. The review discusses the potential role of imaging in identifying low-risk prostate cancer and enabling more appropriate management of the disease. RECENT
FINDINGS: Clinical nomograms have been designed and validated for prediction of the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. The models integrate clinical and biopsy findings. Recently, nomogram models have been designed that incorporate MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging data with clinical and biopsy data for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer; these models performed better than the clinical models.
SUMMARY: Clinical nomograms for the prediction of insignificant disease provide more information than any diagnostic test alone; furthermore, nomograms that incorporate MRI or MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging findings with clinical and biopsy data have been shown to improve the prediction of insignificant cancer. A greater level of certainty, however, is still needed to help segregate low-risk patients from intermediate and high-risk patients. Therefore, more research is needed on imaging of low-risk prostate cancer so that data-driven, evidence-based practice guidelines in oncology combining anatomical, metabolic and laboratory data can be designed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18090495     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f13adc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in prostate cancer imaging techniques and strategies.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  MRI for men undergoing active surveillance or with rising PSA and negative biopsies.

Authors:  Orit Raz; Masoom Haider; John Trachtenberg; Dan Leibovici; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; Peter Choyke; Donald S Coffey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in Korean men: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Jae Seung Chung; Han Yong Choi; Hae-Ryoung Song; Seok-Soo Byun; Seong Il Seo; Cheryn Song; Jin Seon Cho; Sang Eun Lee; Hanjong Ahn; Eun Sik Lee; Tae-Kon Hwang; Wun-Jae Kim; Moon Kee Chung; Tae Young Jung; Ho Song Yu; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Clinically low-risk prostate cancer: evaluation with transrectal doppler ultrasound and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Maria Inês Novis; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni; Luciana Mendes de Oliveira Cerri; Romulo Loss Mattedi; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.